Fairness Implications of Encoding Protected Categorical Attributes
Past research has demonstrated that the explicit use of protected attributes in machine learning can improve both performance and fairness. Many machine learning algorithms, however, cannot directly process categorical attributes, such as country of birth or ethnicity. Because protected attributes frequently are categorical, they must be encoded as features that can be input to a chosen machine learning algorithm, e.g.\ support vector machines, gradient boosting decision trees or linear models. Thereby, encoding methods influence how and what the machine learning algorithm will learn, affecting model performance and fairness. This work compares the accuracy and fairness implications of the two most well-known encoding methods: \emph{one-hot encoding} and \emph{target encoding}. We distinguish between two types of induced bias that may arise from these encoding methods and may lead to unfair models. The first type, \textit{irreducible bias}, is due to direct group category discrimination, and the second type, \textit{reducible bias}, is due to the large variance in statistically underrepresented groups. We investigate the interaction between categorical encodings and target encoding regularization methods that reduce unfairness. Furthermore, we consider the problem of intersectional unfairness that may arise when machine learning best practices improve performance measures by encoding several categorical attributes into a high-cardinality feature.
Code (2)
Tasks
FairnessFeature EngineeringSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Fairness Improvement with Multiple Protected Attributes: How Far Are We?
Existing research mostly improves the fairness of Machine Learning (ML) software regarding a single protected attribute at a time, but this is unrealistic given that many users have multiple protected attributes. This pa…
AttributeFairnessWhen Fair Classification Meets Noisy Protected Attributes
The operationalization of algorithmic fairness comes with several practical challenges, not the least of which is the availability or reliability of protected attributes in datasets. In real-world contexts, practical and…
AttributeClassificationFairnessMarginal Fairness: Fair Decision-Making under Risk Measures
This paper introduces marginal fairness, a new individual fairness notion for equitable decision-making in the presence of protected attributes such as gender, race, and religion. This criterion ensures that decisions ba…
AttributeDecision MakingFairnessTuning Derivatives for Causal Fairness in Machine Learning
Artificial-intelligence systems are becoming ubiquitous in society, yet their predictions typically inherit biases with respect to protected attributes such as race, gender, or age. Classical fairness notions, most notab…
COFFEE: Counterfactual Fairness for Personalized Text Generation in Explainable Recommendation
As language models become increasingly integrated into our digital lives, Personalized Text Generation (PTG) has emerged as a pivotal component with a wide range of applications. However, the bias inherent in user writte…
counterfactualCounterfactual InferenceExplainable RecommendationExplanation Generation+2