Fairness Under Feature Exemptions: Counterfactual and Observational Measures
With the growing use of ML in highly consequential domains, quantifying disparity with respect to protected attributes, e.g., gender, race, etc., is important. While quantifying disparity is essential, sometimes the needs of an occupation may require the use of certain features that are critical in a way that any disparity that can be explained by them might need to be exempted. E.g., in hiring a software engineer for a safety-critical application, coding-skills may be weighed strongly, whereas name, zip code, or reference letters may be used only to the extent that they do not add disparity. In this work, we propose an information-theoretic decomposition of the total disparity (a quantification inspired from counterfactual fairness) into two components: a non-exempt component which quantifies the part that cannot be accounted for by the critical features, and an exempt component that quantifies the remaining disparity. This decomposition allows one to check if the disparity arose purely due to the critical features (inspired from the business necessity defense of disparate impact law) and also enables selective removal of the non-exempt component if desired. We arrive at this decomposition through canonical examples that lead to a set of desirable properties (axioms) that a measure of non-exempt disparity should satisfy. Our proposed measure satisfies all of them. Our quantification bridges ideas of causality, Simpson's paradox, and a body of work from information theory called Partial Information Decomposition. We also obtain an impossibility result showing that no observational measure can satisfy all the desirable properties, leading us to relax our goals and examine observational measures that satisfy only some of them. We perform case studies to show how one can audit/train models while reducing non-exempt disparity.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
counterfactualFairnessSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
FairLogue: A Toolkit for Intersectional Fairness Analysis in Clinical Machine Learning Models
Objective: Algorithmic fairness is essential for equitable and trustworthy machine learning in healthcare. Most fairness tools emphasize single-axis demographic comparisons and may miss compounded disparities affecting i…
Learning for Counterfactual Fairness from Observational Data
Fairness-aware machine learning has attracted a surge of attention in many domains, such as online advertising, personalized recommendation, and social media analysis in web applications. Fairness-aware machine learning …
AttributeCausal DiscoverycounterfactualData Augmentation+2Counterfactual Reasoning for Fair Clinical Risk Prediction
The use of machine learning systems to support decision making in healthcare raises questions as to what extent these systems may introduce or exacerbate disparities in care for historically underrepresented and mistreat…
AttributecounterfactualCounterfactual InferenceCounterfactual Reasoning+3Achieving Counterfactual Fairness with Imperfect Structural Causal Model
Counterfactual fairness alleviates the discrimination between the model prediction toward an individual in the actual world (observational data) and that in counterfactual world (i.e., what if the individual belongs to o…
counterfactualCounterfactual InferenceFairnessmodelFinding Counterfactual Evidences for Node Classification
Counterfactual learning is emerging as an important paradigm, rooted in causality, which promises to alleviate common issues of graph neural networks (GNNs), such as fairness and interpretability. However, as in many rea…
ClassificationcounterfactualFairnessNode Classification