paper-with-me

Papers

FaVOR: LLM-Based Agentic Framework for Factor Mining via Empirical Validation

2026-08-31 · Hyeonjin Kim, Minseok Kim, Seunghyeon Jung, Sujin Pyo, Huisu Jang, Woojin Lee arxiv

Traditional finance relies on experts to hand-craft factors through a principled process grounded in economic rationale. Recent LLM-based multi-agent systems have automated this process, scaling factor mining far beyond manual effort. However, these automated approaches optimize directly for returns and rarely check whether a generated factor still expresses the economic hypothesis that motivated it. We identify this inconsistency between mathematical form and economic meaning as a structural failure mode of return-oriented automation. The resulting factors blur the line between real signals and spurious correlations and break down across regime shifts. We propose FaVOR (Factor Validation through Observable Reasoning), an agentic framework that restructures factor mining around hypothesis-level evidence rather than return outcomes. In place of the standard hypothesis-to-formula leap, FaVOR enforces a three-stage consistency loop tying mathematical form to economic rationale throughout. (1) Decomposition splits a broad economic hypothesis into independent observable conditions. (2) Validation checks whether each factor reflects its intended condition. (3) Integration merges them into a composite whose structure remains interpretable. On the CSI 500 and S&P 500 in 2025, FaVOR outperforms existing baselines while remaining effective across regimes. FaVOR shows that hypothesis-grounded factor discovery produces signals that are interpretable by construction, regime-robust, and economically faithful. The code is available at https://github.com/damilab/FaVOR.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2608.30192

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

QuantaAlpha: An Evolutionary Framework for LLM-Driven Alpha Mining

2026-02-06 · Jun Han, Shuo Zhang, Wei Li, Yifan Dong 외 arxiv

Financial markets are noisy and non-stationary, making alpha mining highly sensitive to backtest noise and regime shifts. While recent agentic frameworks improve automation, they often lack controllable multi-round searc…

Harness-Aware Self-Evolving: Co-Evolving Model Weights, Harness, and Task Solutions

2026-07-04 · Haochen Luo, Yi Huang, Sichun Luo, Fengyuan Liu 외 arxiv

Self-evolving frameworks usually optimize task solutions while treating the surrounding harness as fixed. We introduce Harness-Aware Self-Evolving (HASE), an agentic reinforcement-learning framework in which a single mod…

Is Agentic Code Review Helpful? Mining Developers' Feedback to CodeRabbit Reviews in the Wild

2026-07-03 · Hong Yi Lin, Mingzhao Liang, Kla Tantithamthavorn, Patanamon Thongtanunam arxiv

Agentic code review, where autonomous agents provide code review comments on pull requests, is increasingly integrated into development workflows, yet there is limited empirical evidence on how developers respond to such…

Demystifying the Lifecycle of Failures in Platform-Orchestrated Agentic Workflows

2025-09-28 · Xuyan Ma, Xiaofei Xie, Yawen Wang, Junjie Wang 외 arxiv

Agentic workflows built on low-code orchestration platforms enable rapid development of multi-agent systems, but they also introduce new and poorly understood failure modes that hinder reliability and maintainability. Un…

The Danger of Overthinking: Examining the Reasoning-Action Dilemma in Agentic Tasks

2025-02-12 · Alejandro Cuadron, Dacheng Li, Wenjie Ma, Xingyao Wang 외

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) represent a breakthrough in AI problem-solving capabilities, but their effectiveness in interactive environments can be limited. This paper introduces and analyzes overthinking in LRMs. A ph…