paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Feature-Robustness, Flatness and Generalization Error for Deep Neural Networks

2019-09-25 · Henning Petzka, Linara Adilova, Michael Kamp, Cristian Sminchisescu

The performance of deep neural networks is often attributed to their automated, task-related feature construction. It remains an open question, though, why this leads to solutions with good generalization, even in cases where the number of parameters is larger than the number of samples. Back in the 90s, Hochreiter and Schmidhuber observed that flatness of the loss surface around a local minimum correlates with low generalization error. For several flatness measures, this correlation has been empirically validated. However, it has recently been shown that existing measures of flatness cannot theoretically be related to generalization: if a network uses ReLU activations, the network function can be reparameterized without changing its output in such a way that flatness is changed almost arbitrarily. This paper proposes a natural modification of existing flatness measures that results in invariance to reparameterization. The proposed measures imply a robustness of the network to changes in the input and the hidden layers. Connecting this feature robustness to generalization leads to a generalized definition of the representativeness of data. With this, the generalization error of a model trained on representative data can be bounded by its feature robustness which depends on our novel flatness measure.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Open-Ended Question Answering

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Relative Flatness and Generalization

2020-01-03 · NeurIPS 2021 12 · Henning Petzka, Michael Kamp, Linara Adilova, Cristian Sminchisescu 외

Flatness of the loss curve is conjectured to be connected to the generalization ability of machine learning models, in particular neural networks. While it has been empirically observed that flatness measures consistentl…

Generalization Bounds

A Reparameterization-Invariant Flatness Measure for Deep Neural Networks

2019-11-29 · Henning Petzka, Linara Adilova, Michael Kamp, Cristian Sminchisescu

The performance of deep neural networks is often attributed to their automated, task-related feature construction. It remains an open question, though, why this leads to solutions with good generalization, even in cases …

Open-Ended Question Answering

Understanding Flatness in Generative Models: Its Role and Benefits

2025-03-14 · Taehwan Lee, Kyeongkook Seo, Jaejun Yoo, Sung Whan Yoon

Flat minima, known to enhance generalization and robustness in supervised learning, remain largely unexplored in generative models. In this work, we systematically investigate the role of loss surface flatness in generat…

Noise EstimationQuantization

Why flatness does and does not correlate with generalization for deep neural networks

2021-03-10 · Shuofeng Zhang, Isaac Reid, Guillermo Valle Pérez, Ard Louis

The intuition that local flatness of the loss landscape is correlated with better generalization for deep neural networks (DNNs) has been explored for decades, spawning many different flatness measures. Recently, this li…

image-classificationImage Classification

Gradient Norm Aware Minimization Seeks First-Order Flatness and Improves Generalization

2023-03-03 · CVPR 2023 1 · Xingxuan Zhang, Renzhe Xu, Han Yu, Hao Zou 외

Recently, flat minima are proven to be effective for improving generalization and sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) achieves state-of-the-art performance. Yet the current definition of flatness discussed in SAM and its …