paper-with-me

Papers

Fixing Data That Hurts Performance: Cascading LLMs to Relabel Hard Negatives for Robust Information Retrieval

2025-05-22 · Nandan Thakur, Crystina Zhang, Xueguang Ma, Jimmy Lin

Training robust retrieval and reranker models typically relies on large-scale retrieval datasets; for example, the BGE collection contains 1.6 million query-passage pairs sourced from various data sources. However, we find that certain datasets can negatively impact model effectiveness -- pruning 8 out of 15 datasets from the BGE collection reduces the training set size by 2.35$\times$ and increases nDCG@10 on BEIR by 1.0 point. This motivates a deeper examination of training data quality, with a particular focus on "false negatives", where relevant passages are incorrectly labeled as irrelevant. We propose a simple, cost-effective approach using cascading LLM prompts to identify and relabel hard negatives. Experimental results show that relabeling false negatives with true positives improves both E5 (base) and Qwen2.5-7B retrieval models by 0.7-1.4 nDCG@10 on BEIR and by 1.7-1.8 nDCG@10 on zero-shot AIR-Bench evaluation. Similar gains are observed for rerankers fine-tuned on the relabeled data, such as Qwen2.5-3B on BEIR. The reliability of the cascading design is further supported by human annotation results, where we find judgment by GPT-4o shows much higher agreement with humans than GPT-4o-mini.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2505.16967

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Information RetrievalRetrieval

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Focus 설명 없음
Pruning 설명 없음
SET Dynamic Sparse Training method where weight mask is updated randomly periodically

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

ProjectTest: A Project-level LLM Unit Test Generation Benchmark and Impact of Error Fixing Mechanisms

2025-02-10 · Yibo Wang, Congying Xia, Wenting Zhao, Jiangshu Du 외

Unit test generation has become a promising and important use case of LLMs. However, existing evaluation benchmarks for assessing LLM unit test generation capabilities focus on function- or class-level code rather than m…

A Unified Approach to Routing and Cascading for LLMs

2024-10-14 · Jasper Dekoninck, Maximilian Baader, Martin Vechev

The widespread applicability of large language models (LLMs) has increased the availability of many fine-tuned models of various sizes targeting specific tasks. Given a set of such specialized models, to maximize overall…

Model Selection

MarsCode Agent: AI-native Automated Bug Fixing

2024-09-02 · Yizhou Liu, Pengfei Gao, Xinchen Wang, Jie Liu 외

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have shown significant potential to automate various software development tasks, including code completion, test generation, and bug fixing. However, the application of LLM…

Bug fixingCode CompletionDiversityFault localization

If It's Not Buggy, Don't Fix It: On the Dynamics of Iterative Bug-fixing with LLMs

2026-09-09 · Xietao Wang-Lin, Anton Isopoussu, Louis Mahon arxiv

Large language models (LLMs) have become ubiquitous in software development, with LLM-based automated program repair tools increasingly used during code review. In this report, we explore the iterative blind use of LLMs …

Program Repair

When Reasoning Hurts Legal Drafting: The Verbalization Bottleneck in Patent Claim Generation

2026-07-11 · Lekang Jiang, Wenjun Sun, Stephan Goetz arxiv

Patent claim drafting is a challenging legal drafting task that requires technical expertise, precise linguistic control, strict adherence to formal conventions, and the preservation of complex logical relationships amon…