From Blind Guess to Informed Judgment: Teaching LLMs to Evaluate Materials by Building Knowledge-Augmented Preference Signals
As candidate generation and high-throughput experimentation advance, the primary bottleneck in materials discovery is shifting from property prediction to making reliable evaluations among massive candidate sets. We propose a Knowledge-Augmented Preference Signals Framework, MaterEval, that automatically produces, for the same candidate, two evaluations: an informed judgment that follows expert rules and provides supporting evidence, and a rule-removed blind guess. By pairing the two evaluations as preference data, we guide general-purpose large language models (LLMs), originally lacking materials-specific criteria, from intuitive judgment toward reliable evaluation supported by explicit evidence. To balance throughput, cost, and reliability, we further introduce a fast-slow reasoning scheme that decouples large-scale rapid screening from in-depth review on a small subset. Using high-entropy alloy (HEA) assessment as a case study, we show that, without external retrieval and relying solely on internalized capabilities, small open-source LLMs achieve substantial gains in accuracy, conclusion consistency, and evidence discrimination, approaching the performance of rule-based closed-source LLMs. These results demonstrate that expert rules can be systematically transformed into learnable preference signals, enabling a low-cost and deployable evaluation module for autonomous materials discovery loops.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Teaching Transformers to Solve Combinatorial Problems through Efficient Trial & Error
Despite their proficiency in various language tasks, Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle with combinatorial problems like Satisfiability, Traveling Salesman Problem, or even basic arithmetic. We address this gap throug…
Stochastic OptimizationAutomated Benchmark Generation from Domain Guidelines Informed by Bloom's Taxonomy
Open-ended question answering (QA) evaluates a model's ability to perform contextualized reasoning beyond factual recall. This challenge is especially acute in practice-based domains, where knowledge is procedural and gr…
Question AnsweringLegal Syllogism Prompting: Teaching Large Language Models for Legal Judgment Prediction
Legal syllogism is a form of deductive reasoning commonly used by legal professionals to analyze cases. In this paper, we propose legal syllogism prompting (LoT), a simple prompting method to teach large language models …
ArticlesWhen Contextual Inference Fails: Cancelability in Interactive Instruction Following
We investigate the separation of literal interpretation from contextual inference in a collaborative block-building tasks, where an agent must resolve underspecified instructions using context. We adapt an existing two-s…
Instruction FollowingHiL-Bench (Human-in-Loop Benchmark): Do Agents Know When to Ask for Help?
Frontier coding agents solve complex tasks when given complete context but collapse when specifications are incomplete or ambiguous. The bottleneck is not raw capability, but judgment: knowing when to act autonomously an…