paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

iLLuMinaTE: An LLM-XAI Framework Leveraging Social Science Explanation Theories Towards Actionable Student Performance Feedback

2024-09-12 · Vinitra Swamy, Davide Romano, Bhargav Srinivasa Desikan, Oana-Maria Camburu, Tanja Käser

Recent advances in eXplainable AI (XAI) for education have highlighted a critical challenge: ensuring that explanations for state-of-the-art AI models are understandable for non-technical users such as educators and students. In response, we introduce iLLuMinaTE, a zero-shot, chain-of-prompts LLM-XAI pipeline inspired by Miller's cognitive model of explanation. iLLuMinaTE is designed to deliver theory-driven, actionable feedback to students in online courses. iLLuMinaTE navigates three main stages - causal connection, explanation selection, and explanation presentation - with variations drawing from eight social science theories (e.g. Abnormal Conditions, Pearl's Model of Explanation, Necessity and Robustness Selection, Contrastive Explanation). We extensively evaluate 21,915 natural language explanations of iLLuMinaTE extracted from three LLMs (GPT-4o, Gemma2-9B, Llama3-70B), with three different underlying XAI methods (LIME, Counterfactuals, MC-LIME), across students from three diverse online courses. Our evaluation involves analyses of explanation alignment to the social science theory, understandability of the explanation, and a real-world user preference study with 114 university students containing a novel actionability simulation. We find that students prefer iLLuMinaTE explanations over traditional explainers 89.52% of the time. Our work provides a robust, ready-to-use framework for effectively communicating hybrid XAI-driven insights in education, with significant generalization potential for other human-centric fields.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2409.08027

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Counterfactuals 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Argumentative XAI: A Survey

2021-05-24 · Kristijonas Čyras, Antonio Rago, Emanuele Albini, Pietro Baroni 외

Explainable AI (XAI) has been investigated for decades and, together with AI itself, has witnessed unprecedented growth in recent years. Among various approaches to XAI, argumentative models have been advocated in both t…

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Survey

A Multidimensional Framework for Evaluating Lexical Semantic Change with Social Science Applications

2024-06-10 · Naomi Baes, Nick Haslam, Ekaterina Vylomova

Historical linguists have identified multiple forms of lexical semantic change. We present a three-dimensional framework for integrating these forms and a unified computational methodology for evaluating them concurrentl…

Why Did the Robot Cross the Road? A User Study of Explanation in Human-Robot Interaction

2020-11-30 · Zachary Taschdjian

This work documents a pilot user study evaluating the effectiveness of contrastive, causal and example explanations in supporting human understanding of AI in a hypothetical commonplace human robot interaction HRI scenar…

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Weight of Evidence as a Basis for Human-Oriented Explanations

2019-10-29 · David Alvarez-Melis, Hal Daumé III, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna Wallach

Interpretability is an elusive but highly sought-after characteristic of modern machine learning methods. Recent work has focused on interpretability via $\textit{explanations}$, which justify individual model prediction…

Philosophy

Towards Transparent Robotic Planning via Contrastive Explanations

2020-03-16 · Shenghui Chen, Kayla Boggess, Lu Feng

Providing explanations of chosen robotic actions can help to increase the transparency of robotic planning and improve users' trust. Social sciences suggest that the best explanations are contrastive, explaining not just…