paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

DetermLR: Augmenting LLM-based Logical Reasoning from Indeterminacy to Determinacy

2023-10-28 · Hongda Sun, Weikai Xu, Wei Liu, Jian Luan, Bin Wang, Shuo Shang, Ji-Rong Wen, Rui Yan

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the landscape of reasoning tasks. To enhance the capabilities of LLMs to emulate human reasoning, prior studies have focused on modeling reasoning steps using various thought structures like chains, trees, or graphs. However, LLM-based reasoning still encounters the following challenges: (1) Limited adaptability of preset structures to diverse tasks; (2) Insufficient precision in exploiting known conditions to derive new ones; and (3) Inadequate consideration of historical reasoning experiences for subsequent reasoning steps. To this end, we propose DetermLR, a novel perspective that rethinks the reasoning process as an evolution from indeterminacy to determinacy. First, we categorize known conditions into two types: determinate and indeterminate premises This provides an oveall direction for the reasoning process and guides LLMs in converting indeterminate data into progressively determinate insights. Subsequently, we leverage quantitative measurements to prioritize more relevant premises to explore new insights. Furthermore, we automate the storage and extraction of available premises and reasoning paths with reasoning memory, preserving historical reasoning details for subsequent reasoning steps. Comprehensive experimental results demonstrate that DetermLR surpasses all baselines on various logical reasoning benchmarks: LogiQA, ProofWriter, FOLIO, PrOntoQA, and LogicalDeduction. Compared to previous multi-step reasoning methods, DetermLR achieves higher accuracy with fewer reasoning steps, highlighting its superior efficiency and effectiveness in solving logical reasoning tasks.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2310.18659

Code (1)

xiaomi/determlr 공식 구현

Tasks

Logical Reasoning

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Focus 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Preference Reasoning under Indeterminacy in Large Language Models

2026-08-19 · Hadi Hosseini, Samarth Khanna, Xiyuan Wang arxiv

As large language models evolve into decision-making agents, the ability to reason over preferences becomes fundamental to alignment, coordination, and collective intelligence. Yet, unlike standard benchmarks, real-world…

Visual Indeterminacy in GAN Art

2019-10-10 · Aaron Hertzmann

This paper explores visual indeterminacy as a description for artwork created with Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). Visual indeterminacy describes images which appear to depict real scenes, but, on closer examinat…

Image Generation

Perils of Label Indeterminacy: A Case Study on Prediction of Neurological Recovery After Cardiac Arrest

2025-04-05 · Jakob Schoeffer, Maria De-Arteaga, Jonathan Elmer

The design of AI systems to assist human decision-making typically requires the availability of labels to train and evaluate supervised models. Frequently, however, these labels are unknown, and different ways of estimat…

Decision Making

The Fuzzy ROC

2019-03-04 · Giovanni Parmigiani

The fuzzy ROC extends Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) visualization to the situation where some data points, falling in an indeterminacy region, are not classified. It addresses two challenges: definition of sensitivity a…

SensitivitySpecificity

The NTT DCASE2020 Challenge Task 6 system: Automated Audio Captioning with Keywords and Sentence Length Estimation

2020-07-01 · Yuma Koizumi, Daiki Takeuchi, Yasunori Ohishi, Noboru Harada 외

This technical report describes the system participating to the Detection and Classification of Acoustic Scenes and Events (DCASE) 2020 Challenge, Task 6: automated audio captioning. Our submission focuses on solving two…

Audio captioningCaption GenerationMulti-Task LearningSentence