paper-with-me

Papers

From Protoscience to Epistemic Monoculture: How Benchmarking Set the Stage for the Deep Learning Revolution

2024-04-09 · Bernard J. Koch, David Peterson

Over the past decade, AI research has focused heavily on building ever-larger deep learning models. This approach has simultaneously unlocked incredible achievements in science and technology, and hindered AI from overcoming long-standing limitations with respect to explainability, ethical harms, and environmental efficiency. Drawing on qualitative interviews and computational analyses, our three-part history of AI research traces the creation of this "epistemic monoculture" back to a radical reconceptualization of scientific progress that began in the late 1980s. In the first era of AI research (1950s-late 1980s), researchers and patrons approached AI as a "basic" science that would advance through autonomous exploration and organic assessments of progress (e.g., peer-review, theoretical consensus). The failure of this approach led to a retrenchment of funding in the 1980s. Amid this "AI Winter," an intervention by the U.S. government reoriented the field towards measurable progress on tasks of military and commercial interest. A new evaluation system called "benchmarking" provided an objective way to quantify progress on tasks by focusing exclusively on increasing predictive accuracy on example datasets. Distilling science down to verifiable metrics clarified the roles of scientists, allowed the field to rapidly integrate talent, and provided clear signals of significance and progress. But history has also revealed a tradeoff to this streamlined approach to science: the consolidation around external interests and inherent conservatism of benchmarking has disincentivized exploration beyond scaling monoculture. In the discussion, we explain how AI's monoculture offers a compelling challenge to the belief that basic, exploration-driven research is needed for scientific progress. Implications for the spread of AI monoculture to other sciences in the era of generative AI are also discussed.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2404.06647

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Benchmarking

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

The Oracle's Fingerprint: Correlated AI Forecasting Errors and the Limits of Bias Transmission

2026-04-07 · Theodor Spiro arxiv

When large language models (LLMs) are consulted as forecasting tools, the independence of individual errors -- the foundation of collective intelligence -- may collapse. We test three conditions necessary for this "epist…

Strategic Algorithmic Monoculture: Experimental Evidence from Coordination Games

2026-04-10 · Gonzalo Ballestero, Hadi Hosseini, Samarth Khanna, Ran I. Shorrer arxiv

AI agents increasingly operate in multi-agent environments where outcomes depend on coordination. We distinguish primary algorithmic monoculture -- baseline action similarity -- from strategic algorithmic monoculture, wh…

Generative Monoculture in Large Language Models

2024-07-02 · Fan Wu, Emily Black, Varun Chandrasekaran

We introduce {\em generative monoculture}, a behavior observed in large language models (LLMs) characterized by a significant narrowing of model output diversity relative to available training data for a given task: for …

Code GenerationDiversity

Algorithmic Monoculture and Social Welfare

2021-01-14 · Jon Kleinberg, Manish Raghavan

As algorithms are increasingly applied to screen applicants for high-stakes decisions in employment, lending, and other domains, concerns have been raised about the effects of algorithmic monoculture, in which many decis…

Decision Making

Risk Analysis Techniques for Governed LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems

2025-08-06 · Alistair Reid, Simon O'Callaghan, Liam Carroll, Tiberio Caetano arxiv

Organisations are starting to adopt LLM-based AI agents, with their deployments naturally evolving from single agents towards interconnected, multi-agent networks. Yet a collection of safe agents does not guarantee a saf…

Red Teaming