paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

From Silos to Systems: Process-Oriented Hazard Analysis for AI Systems

2024-10-29 · Shalaleh Rismani, Roel Dobbe, AJung Moon

To effectively address potential harms from AI systems, it is essential to identify and mitigate system-level hazards. Current analysis approaches focus on individual components of an AI system, like training data or models, in isolation, overlooking hazards from component interactions or how they are situated within a company's development process. To this end, we draw from the established field of system safety, which considers safety as an emergent property of the entire system, not just its components. In this work, we translate System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) - a recognized system safety framework - for analyzing AI operation and development processes. We focus on systems that rely on machine learning algorithms and conducted STPA on three case studies involving linear regression, reinforcement learning, and transformer-based generative models. Our analysis explored how STPA's control and system-theoretic perspectives apply to AI systems and whether unique AI traits - such as model opacity, capability uncertainty, and output complexity - necessitate significant modifications to the framework. We find that the key concepts and steps of conducting an STPA readily apply, albeit with a few adaptations tailored for AI systems. We present the Process-oriented Hazard Analysis for AI Systems (PHASE) as a guideline that adapts STPA concepts for AI, making STPA-based hazard analysis more accessible. PHASE enables four key affordances for analysts responsible for managing AI system harms: 1) detection of hazards at the systems level, including those from accumulation of disparate issues; 2) explicit acknowledgment of social factors contributing to experiences of algorithmic harms; 3) creation of traceable accountability chains between harms and those who can mitigate the harm; and 4) ongoing monitoring and mitigation of new hazards.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2410.22526

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Focus 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

An Ecological Robustness-Oriented Approach for Power System Network Expansion

2021-07-13 · Hao Huang, Zeyu Mao, Varuneswara Panyam, Astrid Layton 외

Power systems are critical infrastructure for reliable and secure electric energy delivery. Incidents are increasing, as unexpected multiple hazards ranging from natural disasters to cyberattacks threaten the security an…

A Federated Cox Model with Non-Proportional Hazards

2022-07-11 · Dekai Zhang, Francesca Toni, Matthew Williams

Recent research has shown the potential for neural networks to improve upon classical survival models such as the Cox model, which is widely used in clinical practice. Neural networks, however, typically rely on data tha…

model

Hazard Analysis for Self-Adaptive Systems Using System-Theoretic Process Analysis

2023-04-01 · Simon Diemert, Jens H. Weber

Self-adaptive systems are able to change their behaviour at run-time in response to changes. Self-adaptation is an important strategy for managing uncertainty that is present during the design of modern systems, such as …

Autonomous Vehicles

Towards modelling hazard factors in unstructured data spaces using gradient-based latent interpolation

2021-10-21 · Tobias Weber, Michael Ingrisch, Bernd Bischl, David Rügamer

The application of deep learning in survival analysis (SA) allows utilizing unstructured and high-dimensional data types uncommon in traditional survival methods. This allows to advance methods in fields such as digital …

DecoderDeep LearningSurvival Analysis

Argus: Resilience-Oriented Safety Assurance Framework for End-to-End ADSs

2025-11-12 · Dingji Wang, You Lu, Bihuan Chen, Shuo Hao 외 arxiv

End-to-end autonomous driving systems (ADSs), with their strong capabilities in environmental perception and generalizable driving decisions, are attracting growing attention from both academia and industry. However, onc…

Autonomous Driving