From Stochastic Answers to Verifiable Reasoning: Interpretable Decision-Making with LLM-Generated Code
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for high-stakes decision-making, yet existing approaches struggle to reconcile scalability, interpretability, and reproducibility. Black-box models obscure their reasoning, while recent LLM-based rule systems rely on per-sample evaluation, causing costs to scale with dataset size and introducing stochastic, hallucination-prone outputs. We propose reframing LLMs as code generators rather than per-instance evaluators. A single LLM call generates executable, human-readable decision logic that runs deterministically over structured data, eliminating per-sample LLM queries while enabling reproducible and auditable predictions. We combine code generation with automated statistical validation using precision lift, binomial significance testing, and coverage filtering, and apply cluster-based gap analysis to iteratively refine decision logic without human annotation. We instantiate this framework in venture capital founder screening, a rare-event prediction task with strong interpretability requirements. On VCBench, a benchmark of 4,500 founders with a 9% base success rate, our approach achieves 37.5% precision and an F0.5 score of 25.0%, outperforming GPT-4o (at 30.0% precision and an F0.5 score of 25.7%) while maintaining full interpretability. Each prediction traces to executable rules over human-readable attributes, demonstrating verifiable and interpretable LLM-based decision-making in practice.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Code GenerationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Trade-R1: Bridging Verifiable Rewards to Stochastic Environments via Process-Level Reasoning Verification
Reinforcement Learning (RL) has enabled Large Language Models (LLMs) to achieve remarkable reasoning in domains like mathematics and coding, where verifiable rewards provide clear signals. However, extending this paradig…
Reinforcement LearningBradley-Terry Policy Optimization for Generative Preference Modeling
Reinforcement learning (RL) has recently proven effective at scaling chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning in large language models for tasks with verifiable answers. However, extending RL-based thought training to more gener…
Reinforcement LearningCoReTab: Improving Multimodal Table Understanding with Code-driven Reasoning
Existing datasets for multimodal table understanding, such as MMTab, primarily provide short factual answers without explicit multi-step reasoning supervision. Models trained on these datasets often generate brief respon…
Question AnsweringFact VerificationComposing Neural Learning and Symbolic Reasoning with an Application to Visual Discrimination
We consider the problem of combining machine learning models to perform higher-level cognitive tasks with clear specifications. We propose the novel problem of Visual Discrimination Puzzles (VDP) that requires finding in…
Few-Shot LearningFrom Models to Microtheories: Distilling a Model's Topical Knowledge for Grounded Question Answering
Recent reasoning methods (e.g., chain-of-thought, entailment reasoning) help users understand how language models (LMs) answer a single question, but they do little to reveal the LM's overall understanding, or "theory," …
Question Answering