paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

From Voting to Agent Collaboration: Answer-Type-Aware LLM Pipelines for BioASQ 14b

2026-07-07 · Taeyun Roh, Eunha Lee, Wonjune Jang, Sohyun Chung, Junha Jung, Jaewoo Kang arxiv

Biomedical question answering requires not only accurate extraction of information from scientific literature but also reliable integration of evidence across multiple documents. This study presents a question-type-specific large language model (LLM) framework for BioASQ 14b Task B, designed to improve answer robustness and evidence grounding in biomedical question answering. Rather than applying a single prompting strategy to all questions, the framework selects different inference procedures for yes/no, factoid, and list questions according to their distinct reasoning and evaluation requirements. For yes/no questions, snippet shuffling and self-reflection are used to reduce sensitivity to evidence ordering and improve decision stability. For factoid questions, full-snippet input is combined with chain-of-thought-based in-context learning to support accurate biomedical entity identification. For list questions, a multi-agent architecture is employed, in which evidence extraction, candidate generation, answer verification, and final aggregation are handled collaboratively. Preliminary experiments on BioASQ 13b were used to identify effective inference strategies for each question type, and the resulting framework was subsequently evaluated in the official BioASQ 14b Task B challenge. In the official evaluation, our framework showed competitive performance across multiple batches and achieved first place in the factoid subtask of Batch 4. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of combining question-type-specific inference, ensemble prediction, and agent-based verification for reliable biomedical question answering.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2607.06452

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Question Answering

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Voting or Consensus? Decision-Making in Multi-Agent Debate

2025-02-26 · Lars Benedikt Kaesberg, Jonas Becker, Jan Philip Wahle, Terry Ruas 외

Much of the success of multi-agent debates depends on carefully choosing the right parameters. The decision-making protocol stands out as it can highly impact final model answers, depending on how decisions are reached. …

Decision MakingMMLUStrategyQA

EMS: Multi-Agent Voting via Efficient Majority-then-Stopping

2026-04-03 · Yiqing Liu, Hantao Yao, Wu Liu, Yongdong Zhang arxiv

Majority voting is the standard for aggregating multi-agent responses into a final decision. However, traditional methods typically require all agents to complete their reasoning before aggregation begins, leading to sig…

RoundTable: Investigating Group Decision-Making Mechanism in Multi-Agent Collaboration

2024-11-11 · Young-Min Cho, Raphael Shu, Nilaksh Das, Tamer Alkhouli 외

Effective group decision-making is critical in Multi-Agent Systems (MAS). Yet, how different mechanisms for reaching consensus impact collaboration quality and efficiency remains understudied. We conduct a systematic stu…

Decision Making

More Agents Improve Math Problem Solving but Adversarial Robustness Gap Persists

2025-11-10 · Khashayar Alavi, Zhastay Yeltay, Lucie Flek, Akbar Karimi arxiv

When LLM agents work together, they seem to be more powerful than a single LLM in mathematical question answering. However, are they also more robust to adversarial inputs? We investigate this question using adversariall…

Mathematical Question AnsweringAdversarial Robustness

MAMM-Refine: A Recipe for Improving Faithfulness in Generation with Multi-Agent Collaboration

2025-03-19 · David Wan, Justin Chih-Yao Chen, Elias Stengel-Eskin, Mohit Bansal

Multi-agent collaboration among models has shown promise in reasoning tasks but is underexplored in long-form generation tasks like summarization and question-answering. We extend multi-agent multi-model reasoning to gen…

Long Form Question AnsweringQuestion AnsweringReranking