paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Fundamental Limits of Ridge-Regularized Empirical Risk Minimization in High Dimensions

2020-06-16 · Hossein Taheri, Ramtin Pedarsani, Christos Thrampoulidis

Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) algorithms are widely used in a variety of estimation and prediction tasks in signal-processing and machine learning applications. Despite their popularity, a theory that explains their statistical properties in modern regimes where both the number of measurements and the number of unknown parameters is large is only recently emerging. In this paper, we characterize for the first time the fundamental limits on the statistical accuracy of convex ERM for inference in high-dimensional generalized linear models. For a stylized setting with Gaussian features and problem dimensions that grow large at a proportional rate, we start with sharp performance characterizations and then derive tight lower bounds on the estimation and prediction error that hold over a wide class of loss functions and for any value of the regularization parameter. Our precise analysis has several attributes. First, it leads to a recipe for optimally tuning the loss function and the regularization parameter. Second, it allows to precisely quantify the sub-optimality of popular heuristic choices: for instance, we show that optimally-tuned least-squares is (perhaps surprisingly) approximately optimal for standard logistic data, but the sub-optimality gap grows drastically as the signal strength increases. Third, we use the bounds to precisely assess the merits of ridge-regularization as a function of the over-parameterization ratio. Notably, our bounds are expressed in terms of the Fisher Information of random variables that are simple functions of the data distribution, thus making ties to corresponding bounds in classical statistics.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2006.08917

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Vocal Bursts Intensity Prediction

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

High Dimensional Classification via Regularized and Unregularized Empirical Risk Minimization: Precise Error and Optimal Loss

2019-05-31 · Xiaoyi Mai, Zhenyu Liao

This article provides, through theoretical analysis, an in-depth understanding of the classification performance of the empirical risk minimization framework, in both ridge-regularized and unregularized cases, when high …

ClassificationGeneral Classification

$L_2$-Regularized Empirical Risk Minimization Guarantees Small Smooth Calibration Error

2025-10-15 · Masahiro Fujisawa, Futoshi Futami arxiv

Calibration of predicted probabilities is critical for reliable machine learning, yet it is poorly understood how standard training procedures yield well-calibrated models. This work provides the first theoretical proof …

The Risk of Machine Learning

2017-03-31 · Alberto Abadie, Maximilian Kasy

Many applied settings in empirical economics involve simultaneous estimation of a large number of parameters. In particular, applied economists are often interested in estimating the effects of many-valued treatments (li…

BIG-bench Machine Learning

Regularized Variational and Spectral Log-Density-Ratio Estimation in the Gaussian Location Model

2026-07-02 · Francis Bach arxiv

We study ridge-regularized log-density-ratio estimation in the Gaussian location model with a common covariance matrix. By affine invariance, the model is written as q $\sim$ N(0, I), p $\sim$ N($Δ$, I), with linear feat…

A Risk Comparison of Ordinary Least Squares vs Ridge Regression

2011-05-04 · Paramveer S. Dhillon, Dean P. Foster, Sham M. Kakade, Lyle H. Ungar

We compare the risk of ridge regression to a simple variant of ordinary least squares, in which one simply projects the data onto a finite dimensional subspace (as specified by a Principal Component Analysis) and then pe…

regression