paper-with-me

Papers

FUSE : Failure-aware Usage of Subagent Evidence for MultiModal Search and Recommendation

2025-11-15 · Tushar Vatsa, Vibha Belavadi, Priya Shanmugasundaram, Suhas Suresha, Dewang Sultania arxiv

Multimodal creative assistants decompose user goals and route tasks to subagents for layout, styling, retrieval, and generation. Retrieval quality is pivotal, yet failures can arise at several stages: understanding user intent, choosing content types, finding candidates (recall), or ranking results. Meanwhile, sending and processing images is costly, making naive multimodal approaches impractical. We present FUSE: Failure-aware Usage of Subagent Evidence for MultiModal Search and Recommendation. FUSE replaces most raw-image prompting with a compact Grounded Design Representation (GDR): a selection aware JSON of canvas elements (image, text, shape, icon, video, logo), structure, styles, salient colors, and user selection provided by the Planner team. FUSE implements seven context budgeting strategies: comprehensive baseline prompting, context compression, chain-of-thought reasoning, mini-shot optimization, retrieval-augmented context, two-stage processing, and zero-shot minimalism. Finally, a pipeline attribution layer monitors system performance by converting subagent signals into simple checks: intent alignment, content-type/routing sanity, recall health (e.g., zero-hit and top-match strength), and ranking displacement analysis. We evaluate the seven context budgeting variants across 788 evaluation queries from diverse users and design templates (refer Figure 3). Our systematic evaluation reveals that Context Compression achieves optimal performance across all pipeline stages, with 93.3% intent accuracy, 86.8% routing success(with fallbacks), 99.4% recall, and 88.5% NDCG@5. This approach demonstrates that strategic context summarization outperforms both comprehensive and minimal contextualization strategies.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2601.02365

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

ClawProBench: Trace-Aware Evaluation of AI Agents with Runtime Coverage and Frozen Workplace-Style Holdouts

2026-08-23 · YuanHang Xiao hf

Agent benchmarks often evaluate only final answers even when agents run on stateful runtimes. We argue this under-specifies what is being evaluated: the proper unit is a declared model-plus-runtime configuration whose fa…

Terminus-4B: Can a Smaller Model Replace Frontier LLMs at Agentic Execution Tasks?

2026-05-04 · Spandan Garg, Vikram Nitin, Yufan Huang arxiv

Modern coding agents increasingly delegate specialized subtasks to subagents, which are smaller, focused agentic loops that handle narrow responsibilities like search, debugging or terminal execution. This architectural …

Reinforcement Learning

TSAssistant: A Human-in-the-Loop Agentic Framework for Automated Target Safety Assessment

2026-04-27 · Xiaochen Zheng, Zhiwen Jiang, David Tokar, Yexiang Cheng 외 arxiv

Target Safety Assessment (TSA) requires systematic integration of genetic, transcriptomic, target homology, pharmacological, and clinical data to evaluate potential safety liabilities of therapeutic targets. This process…

PARSER: Read in Parallel, Reason in Depth for Long-Context LLM Agents

2026-09-06 · Kun Li, Zexuan Qiu, Tianhua Zhang, Irwin King 외 hf

Sequential memory agents process long documents by reading chunks one after another while maintaining a compact memory state, coupling document traversal to reasoning depth. This coupling introduces sensitivity to eviden…

Reinforcement Learning

Prime Agent: A Self-Improving RLM Harness

2026-08-24 · Seth Karten, Alex L. Zhang, Kevin Thomas, Sebastian Müller 외 arxiv

Language models are sequential processors, but long-horizon agency requires external information and computation beyond model weights and active context. Prime Agent is an open-source harness for long-horizon evaluation …