Fuzzy Labeling Semantics for Quantitative Argumentation
Evaluating argument strength in quantitative argumentation systems has received increasing attention in the field of abstract argumentation. The concept of acceptability degree is widely adopted in gradual semantics, however, it may not be sufficient in many practical applications. In this paper, we provide a novel quantitative method called fuzzy labeling for fuzzy argumentation systems, in which a triple of acceptability, rejectability, and undecidability degrees is used to evaluate argument strength. Such a setting sheds new light on defining argument strength and provides a deeper understanding of the status of arguments. More specifically, we investigate the postulates of fuzzy labeling, which present the rationality requirements for semantics concerning the acceptability, rejectability, and undecidability degrees. We then propose a class of fuzzy labeling semantics conforming to the above postulates and investigate the relations between fuzzy labeling semantics and existing work in the literature.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Abstract ArgumentationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
On SCC-recursiveness in Quantitative Argumentation
Abstract argumentation is a reasoning model for evaluating arguments based on various semantics. SCC-recursiveness is a sophisticated property of semantics that provides a general schema for characterizing semantics thro…
Abstract ArgumentationEvidential-Based Higher-Order Set Argumentation Framework
Evidential argumentation extends Dung's abstract argumentation by requiring arguments and interactions to be backed by chains of evidence rooted in prima-facie elements. However, existing formalisms lack a unified treatm…
From Weighted Conditionals of Multilayer Perceptrons to Gradual Argumentation and Back
A fuzzy multipreference semantics has been recently proposed for weighted conditional knowledge bases, and used to develop a logical semantics for Multilayer Perceptrons, by regarding a deep neural network (after trainin…
Encoding Argumentation Frameworks to Propositional Logic Systems
The theory of argumentation frameworks ($AF$s) has been a useful tool for artificial intelligence. The research of the connection between $AF$s and logic is an important branch. This paper generalizes the encoding method…
LLM-based Argument Mining meets Argumentation and Description Logics: a Unified Framework for Reasoning about Debates
Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve strong performance in analyzing and generating text, yet they struggle with explicit, transparent, and verifiable reasoning over complex texts such as those containing debates. In par…
Argument Mining