paper-with-me

Papers

G-RRM: Guiding Symbolic Solvers with Recurrent Reasoning Models

2026-07-02 · Timo Bertram, Sidhant Bhavnani, Richard Freinschlag, Erich Kobler, Andreas Mayr, Günter Klambauer arxiv

In this work, we focus on SE-RRMs, a symbol-equivariant instantiation of RRMs that exhibits improved extrapolation to larger problem sizes. We propose a neuro-symbolic approach, ``Guiding with Recurrent Reasoning Models'' (G-RRM), which integrates SE-RRMs with symbolic solvers for constraint satisfaction problems. SE-RRMs act as neural solvers that generate full solution proposals and guide classical symbolic solvers, such as backtracking or SAT-based methods like Glucose 4.1 and CaDiCaL 3.0.0, that produce globally correct solutions. Centrally, we investigate when neural guidance with G-RRM improves the search efficiency of symbolic solvers. % Our experiments show that the efficacy of G-RRM depends on two conditions: first, the problem instances must have an expansive combinatorial search space to expose potential gains, and second, the solver architecture must be capable of dynamically overwriting its branching choices to recover when neural hints are imperfect. When these conditions hold, guidance drives median conflict counts to zero and yields significant wall-clock speedups: on $9\times9$ Sudoku, where the SE-RRM correctly solves $91.1\%$ of instances, backtracking accelerates by $33.3\times$ and Glucose 4.1 by $1.70\times$ (median, $p<0.001$), with Glucose 4.1 retaining a $1.17\times$ speedup on perfect-hint $25\times25$ grids. In contrast, CaDiCaL 3.0.0, whose runtime is overhead-dominated and which always respects the injected branching hints rather than overwriting them, shows no significant speedup (median $1.02\times$, n.s.) and even a small significant mean slowdown ($0.90\times$) on $9\times9$. These results delineate the regimes in which neural guidance translates into practical speedups.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2607.02491

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

A Closer Look at Logical Reasoning with LLMs: The Choice of Tool Matters

2024-06-01 · Long Hei Matthew Lam, Ramya Keerthy Thatikonda, Ehsan Shareghi

The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has demonstrated promising progress in solving logical reasoning tasks effectively. Several recent approaches have proposed to change the role of the LLM from the reasoner in…

Logical ReasoningTranslation

Chronosymbolic Learning: Efficient CHC Solving with Symbolic Reasoning and Inductive Learning

2023-05-02 · Ziyan Luo, Xujie Si

Solving Constrained Horn Clauses (CHCs) is a fundamental challenge behind a wide range of verification and analysis tasks. Data-driven approaches show great promise in improving CHC solving without the painstaking manual…

Inductive Learning

ReaComp: Compiling LLM Reasoning into Symbolic Solvers for Efficient Program Synthesis

2026-05-06 · Atharva Naik, Yash Mathur, Prakam, Carolyn Rose 외 arxiv

LLMs can solve program synthesis tasks but remain inefficient and unreliable on hard instances requiring large combinatorial search. Given a small set of reasoning traces, we use coding agents to compile them into reusab…

Program Synthesis

Adaptive LLM-Symbolic Reasoning via Dynamic Logical Solver Composition

2025-10-08 · Lei Xu, Pierre Beckmann, Marco Valentino, André Freitas arxiv

Neuro-symbolic NLP methods aim to leverage the complementary strengths of large language models and formal logical solvers. However, current approaches are mostly static in nature, i.e., the integration of a target solve…

When Do Symbolic Solvers Enhance Reasoning in Large Language Models?

2025-12-02 · Zhiyuan He, Dingmin Wang arxiv

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) achieve strong performance on complex reasoning tasks by generating long Chains of Thought (CoTs). However, this paradigm might incur substantial token overhead, especially when models "over…

Code Generation