paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

GANMEX: One-vs-One Attributions Guided by GAN-based Counterfactual Explanation Baselines

2020-11-11 · Sheng-Min Shih, Pin-Ju Tien, Zohar Karnin

Attribution methods have been shown as promising approaches for identifying key features that led to learned model predictions. While most existing attribution methods rely on a baseline input for performing feature perturbations, limited research has been conducted to address the baseline selection issues. Poor choices of baselines limit the ability of one-vs-one (1-vs-1) explanations for multi-class classifiers, which means the attribution methods were not able to explain why an input belongs to its original class but not the other specified target class. 1-vs-1 explanation is crucial when certain classes are more similar than others, e.g. two bird types among multiple animals, by focusing on key differentiating features rather than shared features across classes. In this paper, we present GAN-based Model EXplainability (GANMEX), a novel approach applying Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) by incorporating the to-be-explained classifier as part of the adversarial networks. Our approach effectively selects the counterfactual baseline as the closest realistic sample belong to the target class, which allows attribution methods to provide true 1-vs-1 explanations. We showed that GANMEX baselines improved the saliency maps and led to stronger performance on perturbation-based evaluation metrics over the existing baselines. Existing attribution results are known for being insensitive to model randomization, and we demonstrated that GANMEX baselines led to better outcome under the cascading randomization of the model.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2011.06015

Code (1)

pinjutien/GANMEX 공식 구현 tf

Tasks

counterfactualCounterfactual Explanation

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

GANMEX: Class-Targeted One-vs-One Attributions using GAN-based Model Explainability

2021-01-01 · Sheng-Min Shih, Pin-Ju Tien, Zohar Karnin

Attribution methods have been shown as promising approaches for identifying key features that led to learned model predictions. While most existing attribution methods rely on a baseline input for performing feature pert…

On the Connection between Game-Theoretic Feature Attributions and Counterfactual Explanations

2023-07-13 · Emanuele Albini, Shubham Sharma, Saumitra Mishra, Danial Dervovic 외

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has received widespread interest in recent years, and two of the most popular types of explanations are feature attributions, and counterfactual explanations. These classes of ap…

counterfactualCounterfactual ExplanationExplainable artificial intelligenceExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)+1

On the notion of missingness for path attribution explainability methods in medical settings: Guiding the selection of medically meaningful baselines

2025-08-20 · Alexander Geiger, Lars Wagner, Daniel Rueckert, Dirk Wilhelm 외 arxiv

The explainability of deep learning models remains a significant challenge, particularly in the medical domain where interpretable outputs are essential for clinical trust and transparency. Path attribution methods such …

Counterfactual Shapley Additive Explanations

2021-10-27 · Emanuele Albini, Jason Long, Danial Dervovic, Daniele Magazzeni

Feature attributions are a common paradigm for model explanations due to their simplicity in assigning a single numeric score for each input feature to a model. In the actionable recourse setting, wherein the goal of the…

counterfactualCounterfactual ExplanationExplainable artificial intelligenceFeature Importance

Not All Explanations Simulate Equally: Comparing Verbalized Feature Attributions and Self-Generated Rationales

2026-05-31 · Pingjun Hong, Benjamin Roth arxiv

Natural-language explanations are often treated as a unified interface for understanding model behavior, but different explanation sources may support simulation in different ways. This paper compares two families of exp…

Question Answering