paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

GANs Settle Scores!

2023-06-02 · Siddarth Asokan, Nishanth Shetty, Aadithya Srikanth, Chandra Sekhar Seelamantula

Generative adversarial networks (GANs) comprise a generator, trained to learn the underlying distribution of the desired data, and a discriminator, trained to distinguish real samples from those output by the generator. A majority of GAN literature focuses on understanding the optimality of the discriminator through integral probability metric (IPM) or divergence based analysis. In this paper, we propose a unified approach to analyzing the generator optimization through variational approach. In $f$-divergence-minimizing GANs, we show that the optimal generator is the one that matches the score of its output distribution with that of the data distribution, while in IPM GANs, we show that this optimal generator matches score-like functions, involving the flow-field of the kernel associated with a chosen IPM constraint space. Further, the IPM-GAN optimization can be seen as one of smoothed score-matching, where the scores of the data and the generator distributions are convolved with the kernel associated with the constraint. The proposed approach serves to unify score-based training and existing GAN flavors, leveraging results from normalizing flows, while also providing explanations for empirical phenomena such as the stability of non-saturating GAN losses. Based on these results, we propose novel alternatives to $f$-GAN and IPM-GAN training based on score and flow matching, and discriminator-guided Langevin sampling.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2306.01654

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

A domain agnostic measure for monitoring and evaluating GANs

2018-11-13 · NeurIPS 2019 12 · Paulina Grnarova, Kfir. Y. Levy, Aurelien Lucchi, Nathanael Perraudin 외

Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have shown remarkable results in modeling complex distributions, but their evaluation remains an unsettled issue. Evaluations are essential for: (i) relative assessment of different…

Comparing PCG metrics with Human Evaluation in Minecraft Settlement Generation

2021-07-06 · Jean-Baptiste Hervé, Christoph Salge

There are a range of metrics that can be applied to the artifacts produced by procedural content generation, and several of them come with qualitative claims. In this paper, we adapt a range of existing PCG metrics to ge…

DiversityMinecraft

Pros and Cons of GAN Evaluation Measures

2018-02-09 · Ali Borji

Generative models, in particular generative adversarial networks (GANs), have received significant attention recently. A number of GAN variants have been proposed and have been utilized in many applications. Despite larg…

A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scores

2018-04-23 · WS 2018 10 · Matt Post

The field of machine translation faces an under-recognized problem because of inconsistency in the reporting of scores from its dominant metric. Although people refer to "the" BLEU score, BLEU is in fact a parameterized …

Machine TranslationTranslation

Generating Material Maps to Map Informal Settlements

2018-11-30 · Patrick Helber, Bradley Gram-Hansen, Indhu Varatharajan, Faiza Azam 외

Detecting and mapping informal settlements encompasses several of the United Nations sustainable development goals. This is because informal settlements are home to the most socially and economically vulnerable people on…