Robust Difference-in-differences Models
The difference-in-differences (DID) method identifies the average treatment effects on the treated (ATT) under mainly the so-called parallel trends (PT) assumption. The most common and widely used approach to justify the PT assumption is the pre-treatment period examination. If a null hypothesis of the same trend in the outcome means for both treatment and control groups in the pre-treatment periods is rejected, researchers believe less in PT and the DID results. This paper develops a robust generalized DID method that utilizes all the information available not only from the pre-treatment periods but also from multiple data sources. Our approach interprets PT in a different way using a notion of selection bias, which enables us to generalize the standard DID estimand by defining an information set that may contain multiple pre-treatment periods or other baseline covariates. Our main assumption states that the selection bias in the post-treatment period lies within the convex hull of all selection biases in the pre-treatment periods. We provide a sufficient condition for this assumption to hold. Based on the baseline information set we construct, we provide an identified set for the ATT that always contains the true ATT under our identifying assumption, and also the standard DID estimand. We extend our proposed approach to multiple treatment periods DID settings. We propose a flexible and easy way to implement the method. Finally, we illustrate our methodology through some numerical and empirical examples.
Code (1)
Tasks
Selection biasSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Quantifying sex differences in brain network topology by aggregating nodal centrality rankings
Although numerous studies report significant sex differences in functional connectivity, these differences do not sufficient to reveal specific functional disparities among brain regions or the topological differences in…
Functional ConnectivityCompare and Contrast: Learning Prominent Visual Differences
Relative attribute models can compare images in terms of all detected properties or attributes, exhaustively predicting which image is fancier, more natural, and so on without any regard to ordering. However, when humans…
AttributeImage ClassificationSynthetic Difference in Differences for Repeated Cross-Sectional Data
The synthetic difference-in-differences method provides an efficient method to estimate a causal effect with a latent factor model. However, it relies on the use of panel data. This paper presents an adaptation of the sy…
Principal Differences Analysis: Interpretable Characterization of Differences between Distributions
We introduce principal differences analysis (PDA) for analyzing differences between high-dimensional distributions. The method operates by finding the projection that maximizes the Wasserstein divergence between the resu…
HippocampusLocalization based on enhanced low frequency interaural level difference
The processing of low-frequency interaural time differences is found to be problematic among hearing-impaired people. The current generation of beamformers does not consider this deficiency. In an attempt to tackle this …