paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Generating Fact Checking Briefs

2020-11-10 · EMNLP 2020 11 · Angela Fan, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Guillaume Wenzek, Marzieh Saeidi, Andreas Vlachos, Antoine Bordes, Sebastian Riedel

Fact checking at scale is difficult -- while the number of active fact checking websites is growing, it remains too small for the needs of the contemporary media ecosystem. However, despite good intentions, contributions from volunteers are often error-prone, and thus in practice restricted to claim detection. We investigate how to increase the accuracy and efficiency of fact checking by providing information about the claim before performing the check, in the form of natural language briefs. We investigate passage-based briefs, containing a relevant passage from Wikipedia, entity-centric ones consisting of Wikipedia pages of mentioned entities, and Question-Answering Briefs, with questions decomposing the claim, and their answers. To produce QABriefs, we develop QABriefer, a model that generates a set of questions conditioned on the claim, searches the web for evidence, and generates answers. To train its components, we introduce QABriefDataset which we collected via crowdsourcing. We show that fact checking with briefs -- in particular QABriefs -- increases the accuracy of crowdworkers by 10% while slightly decreasing the time taken. For volunteer (unpaid) fact checkers, QABriefs slightly increase accuracy and reduce the time required by around 20%.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2011.05448

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Fact CheckingQuestion Answering

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Generating Scientific Claims for Zero-Shot Scientific Fact Checking

2022-03-24 · ACL 2022 5 · Dustin Wright, David Wadden, Kyle Lo, Bailey Kuehl 외

Automated scientific fact checking is difficult due to the complexity of scientific language and a lack of significant amounts of training data, as annotation requires domain expertise. To address this challenge, we prop…

Fact CheckingNegation

Generating Scientific Claims for Zero-Shot Scientific Fact Checking

2022-01-16 · ACL ARR January 2022 1 · Anonymous

Automated scientific fact checking is difficult due to the complexity of scientific language and a lack of significant amounts of training data, as annotation requires domain expertise. To address this challenge, we prop…

Fact CheckingNegation

Explainable Automated Fact-Checking: A Survey

2020-11-07 · COLING 2020 8 · Neema Kotonya, Francesca Toni

A number of exciting advances have been made in automated fact-checking thanks to increasingly larger datasets and more powerful systems, leading to improvements in the complexity of claims which can be accurately fact-c…

Fact CheckingSurvey

Augmenting Fundamental Analysis with Large Language Models: A RAG-Based System for Generating Investor Briefs

2026-07-10 · Bartosz Ziółko, Kacper Dobrzeniewski arxiv

In this study, we examine the opportunities brought by Large Language Models (LLMs) to various aspects of fundamental analysis of companies based on their reports as well as data and documents describing macroeconomic si…

Generating Fact Checking Explanations

2020-04-13 · ACL 2020 6 · Pepa Atanasova, Jakob Grue Simonsen, Christina Lioma, Isabelle Augenstein

Most existing work on automated fact checking is concerned with predicting the veracity of claims based on metadata, social network spread, language used in claims, and, more recently, evidence supporting or denying clai…

Fact CheckingInformativeness