paper-with-me

Papers

Generating Synthetic Documents for Cross-Encoder Re-Rankers: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT and Human Experts

2023-05-03 · Arian Askari, Mohammad Aliannejadi, Evangelos Kanoulas, Suzan Verberne

We investigate the usefulness of generative Large Language Models (LLMs) in generating training data for cross-encoder re-rankers in a novel direction: generating synthetic documents instead of synthetic queries. We introduce a new dataset, ChatGPT-RetrievalQA, and compare the effectiveness of models fine-tuned on LLM-generated and human-generated data. Data generated with generative LLMs can be used to augment training data, especially in domains with smaller amounts of labeled data. We build ChatGPT-RetrievalQA based on an existing dataset, human ChatGPT Comparison Corpus (HC3), consisting of public question collections with human responses and answers from ChatGPT. We fine-tune a range of cross-encoder re-rankers on either human-generated or ChatGPT-generated data. Our evaluation on MS MARCO DEV, TREC DL'19, and TREC DL'20 demonstrates that cross-encoder re-ranking models trained on ChatGPT responses are statistically significantly more effective zero-shot re-rankers than those trained on human responses. In a supervised setting, the human-trained re-rankers outperform the LLM-trained re-rankers. Our novel findings suggest that generative LLMs have high potential in generating training data for neural retrieval models. Further work is needed to determine the effect of factually wrong information in the generated responses and test our findings' generalizability with open-source LLMs. We release our data, code, and cross-encoders checkpoints for future work.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2305.02320

Code (1)

arian-askari/chatgpt-retrievalqa 공식 구현

Tasks

Re-RankingRetrieval

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

Test 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Drowning in Documents: Consequences of Scaling Reranker Inference

2024-11-18 · Mathew Jacob, Erik Lindgren, Matei Zaharia, Michael Carbin 외

Rerankers, typically cross-encoders, are often used to re-score the documents retrieved by cheaper initial IR systems. This is because, though expensive, rerankers are assumed to be more effective. We challenge this assu…

RerankingRetrieval

A Thorough Comparison of Cross-Encoders and LLMs for Reranking SPLADE

2024-03-15 · Hervé Déjean, Stéphane Clinchant, Thibault Formal

We present a comparative study between cross-encoder and LLMs rerankers in the context of re-ranking effective SPLADE retrievers. We conduct a large evaluation on TREC Deep Learning datasets and out-of-domain datasets su…

RerankingRe-Ranking

Improving Bi-encoder Document Ranking Models with Two Rankers and Multi-teacher Distillation

2021-03-11 · Jaekeol Choi, Euna Jung, Jangwon Suh, Wonjong Rhee

BERT-based Neural Ranking Models (NRMs) can be classified according to how the query and document are encoded through BERT's self-attention layers - bi-encoder versus cross-encoder. Bi-encoder models are highly efficient…

Document Ranking

Enhancing Documents with Multidimensional Relevance Statements in Cross-encoder Re-ranking

2023-06-19 · Rishabh Upadhyay, Arian Askari, Gabriella Pasi, Marco Viviani

In this paper, we propose a novel approach to consider multiple dimensions of relevance beyond topicality in cross-encoder re-ranking. On the one hand, current multidimensional retrieval models often use na\"ive solution…

Re-RankingRetrieval

How Different are Pre-trained Transformers for Text Ranking?

2022-04-05 · David Rau, Jaap Kamps

In recent years, large pre-trained transformers have led to substantial gains in performance over traditional retrieval models and feedback approaches. However, these results are primarily based on the MS Marco/TREC Deep…

Passage RetrievalRetrieval