GPT-4V(ision) is a Human-Aligned Evaluator for Text-to-3D Generation
Despite recent advances in text-to-3D generative methods, there is a notable absence of reliable evaluation metrics. Existing metrics usually focus on a single criterion each, such as how well the asset aligned with the input text. These metrics lack the flexibility to generalize to different evaluation criteria and might not align well with human preferences. Conducting user preference studies is an alternative that offers both adaptability and human-aligned results. User studies, however, can be very expensive to scale. This paper presents an automatic, versatile, and human-aligned evaluation metric for text-to-3D generative models. To this end, we first develop a prompt generator using GPT-4V to generate evaluating prompts, which serve as input to compare text-to-3D models. We further design a method instructing GPT-4V to compare two 3D assets according to user-defined criteria. Finally, we use these pairwise comparison results to assign these models Elo ratings. Experimental results suggest our metric strongly align with human preference across different evaluation criteria.
Code (1)
Tasks
3D GenerationText to 3DMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Fairer Preferences Elicit Improved Human-Aligned Large Language Model Judgments
Large language models (LLMs) have shown promising abilities as cost-effective and reference-free evaluators for assessing language generation quality. In particular, pairwise LLM evaluators, which compare two generated t…
FairnessLanguage ModelingLanguage ModellingLarge Language Model+2Judge the Judges: A Large-Scale Evaluation Study of Neural Language Models for Online Review Generation
We conduct a large-scale, systematic study to evaluate the existing evaluation methods for natural language generation in the context of generating online product reviews. We compare human-based evaluators with a variety…
DiversityReview GenerationText GenerationGPT-4V(ision) as a Generalist Evaluator for Vision-Language Tasks
Automatically evaluating vision-language tasks is challenging, especially when it comes to reflecting human judgments due to limitations in accounting for fine-grained details. Although GPT-4V has shown promising results…
Image GenerationImage to textVGA-BenchV2: An Expanded Unified Benchmark and Multi-Model Framework for Evaluating Video Aesthetics and Generation Quality
We introduce VGA-BenchV2, an extended human-aligned benchmark and optimization framework for jointly evaluating and improving video generation quality and aesthetic value. Built upon VGA-Bench, VGA-BenchV2 preserves the …
Reinforcement LearningVideo GenerationBenchmarking Cognitive Biases in Large Language Models as Evaluators
Large Language Models are cognitively biased judges. Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently been shown to be effective as automatic evaluators with simple prompting and in-context learning. In this work, we assemble …
BenchmarkingIn-Context Learning