Grade Score: Quantifying LLM Performance in Option Selection
This study introduces the "Grade Score", a novel metric designed to evaluate the consistency and fairness of Large Language Models (LLMs) when used as multiple-choice judges with respect to order bias and choice consistency. The Grade Score combines Entropy, which measures order bias, and Mode Frequency, which assesses choice stability, offering insights into LLMs' reliability and impartiality. The study explores techniques such as prompt engineering and option sampling strategies to optimize the Grade Score, demonstrating their effectiveness in enhancing LLMs' performance. Results showcase varying performances among LLMs with respect to prompts and highlight the positive impact of including irrelevant options. The study also identifies an emergent behavior in instruction-following models, where they adapt to instructions targeting specific biases, demonstrating their adaptability. The Grade Score facilitates comparisons between LLMs and encourages ongoing research towards optimizing their decision-making processes, with potential implications for improving their reliability and fairness in various applications. All code is available on GitHub https://github.com/IoDmitri/GradeLab
Code (1)
Tasks
Decision MakingFairnessInstruction FollowingMultiple-choicePrompt EngineeringSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
UNICORN: Ultrasound Nakagami Imaging via Score Matching and Adaptation
Nakagami imaging holds promise for visualizing and quantifying tissue scattering in ultrasound waves, with potential applications in tumor diagnosis and fat fraction estimation which are challenging to discern by convent…
parameter estimationUnveiling Selection Biases: Exploring Order and Token Sensitivity in Large Language Models
In this paper, we investigate the phenomena of "selection biases" in Large Language Models (LLMs), focusing on problems where models are tasked with choosing the optimal option from an ordered sequence. We delve into bia…
Decision MakingSensitivityCLEAR: Revealing How Noise and Ambiguity Degrade Reliability in LLMs for Medicine
Medical large language model (LLM) evaluations rely on simplified, exam-style benchmarks that rarely reflect the ambiguity of real-world medical inquiries. We introduce the CLinical Evaluation of Ambiguity and Reliabilit…
Benchmark Health Index: A Systematic Framework for Benchmarking the Benchmarks of LLMs
Large Language Models (LLMs) are advancing rapidly, yet the benchmarks used to measure this progress are becoming increasingly unreliable. Score inflation and selective reporting have eroded the authority of standard ben…
UNICORN: Ultrasound Nakagami Imaging via Score Matching and Adaptation for Assessing Hepatic Steatosis
Ultrasound imaging is an essential first-line tool for assessing hepatic steatosis. While conventional B-mode ultrasound imaging has limitations in providing detailed tissue characterization, ultrasound Nakagami imaging …