paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Greater accessibility can amplify discrimination in generative AI

2026-03-23 · Carolin Holtermann, Minh Duc Bui, Kaitlyn Zhou, Valentin Hofmann, Katharina von der Wense, Anne Lauscher arxiv

Hundreds of millions of people rely on large language models (LLMs) for education, work, and even healthcare. Yet these models are known to reproduce and amplify social biases present in their training data. Moreover, text-based interfaces remain a barrier for many, for example, users with limited literacy, motor impairments, or mobile-only devices. Voice interaction promises to expand accessibility, but unlike text, speech carries identity cues that users cannot easily mask, raising concerns about whether accessibility gains may come at the cost of equitable treatment. Here we show that audio-enabled LLMs exhibit systematic gender discrimination, shifting responses toward gender-stereotyped adjectives and occupations solely on the basis of speaker voice, and amplifying bias beyond that observed in text-based interaction. Thus, voice interfaces do not merely extend text models to a new modality but introduce distinct bias mechanisms tied to paralinguistic cues. Complementary survey evidence ($n=1,000$) shows that infrequent chatbot users are most hesitant to undisclosed attribute inference and most likely to disengage when such practices are revealed. To demonstrate a potential mitigation strategy, we show that pitch manipulation can systematically regulate gender-discriminatory outputs. Overall, our findings reveal a critical tension in AI development: efforts to expand accessibility through voice interfaces simultaneously create new pathways for discrimination, demanding that fairness and accessibility be addressed in tandem.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2603.22260

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Convergent Evolution in Neural Representation Space: Emergent Order in Deep Belief Networks

2026-08-06 · Patrick Krauss, Achim Schilling, Andreas Maier, Thomas Kinfe 외 arxiv

Deep Belief Networks (DBNs) learn hierarchical generative models without class supervision. Here, we ask whether this purely unsupervised process nevertheless organizes internal representations according to the unknown d…

Dimensionality Reduction

Generalizing Fairness to Generative Language Models via Reformulation of Non-discrimination Criteria

2024-03-13 · Sara Sterlie, Nina Weng, Aasa Feragen

Generative AI, such as large language models, has undergone rapid development within recent years. As these models become increasingly available to the public, concerns arise about perpetuating and amplifying harmful bia…

Fairness

What Makes Systemic Discrimination, "Systemic?" Exposing the Amplifiers of Inequity

2024-03-16 · David B. McMillon

Drawing on work spanning economics, public health, education, sociology, and law, I formalize theoretically what makes systemic discrimination "systemic." Injustices do not occur in isolation, but within a complex system…

Sociology

Fairness Testing through Extreme Value Theory

2025-01-20 · Verya Monjezi, Ashutosh Trivedi, Vladik Kreinovich, Saeid Tizpaz-Niari

Data-driven software is increasingly being used as a critical component of automated decision-support systems. Since this class of software learns its logic from historical data, it can encode or amplify discriminatory p…

counterfactualFairness

Beyond Categories of Caste: Examining Caste Bias and Morality in Text-to-Image AI Models

2026-04-28 · Divyanshu Kumar Singh, Dipto Das, Deepika Rama Subramanian, Koustuv Saha 외 arxiv

Text-to-Image (T2I) models have shown promising utility across various domains. However, such models are also amplifying harmful societal biases in their outputs. In the context of South Asia, recent work has shown caste…