Greedy Allocations and Equitable Matchings
I provide a novel approach to characterizing the set of interim realizable allocations, in the spirit of Matthews (1984) and Border (1991). The approach allows me to identify precisely why exact characterizations are difficult to obtain in some settings. The main results of the paper then show how to adapt the approach in order to obtain approximate characterizations of the interim realizable set in such settings. As an application, I study multi-item allocation problems when agents have capacity constraints. I identify necessary conditions for interim realizability, and show that these conditions are sufficient for realizability when the interim allocation in question is scaled by 1/2. I then characterize a subset of the realizable polytope which contains all such scaled allocations. This polytope is generated by a majorization relationship between the scaled interim allocations and allocations induced by a certain ``greedy algorithm''. I use these results to study mechanism design with equity concerns and model ambiguity. I also relate optimal mechanisms to the commonly used deferred acceptance and serial dictatorship matching algorithms. For example, I provide conditions on the principal's objective such that by carefully choosing school priorities and running deferred acceptance, the principal can guarantee at least half of the optimal (full information) payoff.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
The psychology of prizes: Loss aversion and optimal tournament rewards
We study the optimal allocation of prizes in rank-order tournaments with loss averse agents. Prize sharing becomes increasingly optimal with loss aversion because more equitable prizes reduce the marginal psychological c…
The lattice of envy-free many-to-many matchings with contracts
We study envy-free allocations in a many-to-many matching model with contracts in which agents on one side of the market (doctors) are endowed with substitutable choice functions and agents on the other side of the marke…
BlockingPositionEquitable screening
I study the problem of a government providing benefits while considering the perceived equity of the resulting allocation. Such concerns are modeled through an equity constraint requiring that equally deserving agents re…
Matching in Dynamic Imbalanced Markets
We study dynamic matching in exchange markets with easy- and hard-to-match agents. A greedy policy, which attempts to match agents upon arrival, ignores the positive externality that waiting agents generate by facilitati…
Fair Division Without Disparate Impact
We consider the problem of dividing items between individuals in a way that is fair both in the sense of distributional fairness and in the sense of not having disparate impact across protected classes. An important exis…
FairnessRecommendation Systems