paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Group Average Treatment Effects for Observational Studies

2019-11-07 · Daniel Jacob

The paper proposes an estimator to make inference of heterogeneous treatment effects sorted by impact groups (GATES) for non-randomised experiments. The groups can be understood as a broader aggregation of the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) where the number of groups is set in advance. In economics, this approach is similar to pre-analysis plans. Observational studies are standard in policy evaluation from labour markets, educational surveys and other empirical studies. To control for a potential selection-bias, we implement a doubly-robust estimator in the first stage. We use machine learning methods to learn the conditional mean functions as well as the propensity score. The group average treatment effect is then estimated via a linear projection model. The linear model is easy to interpret, provides p-values and confidence intervals, and limits the danger of finding spurious heterogeneity due to small subgroups in the CATE. To control for confounding in the linear model, we use Neyman-orthogonal moments to partial out the effect that covariates have on both, the treatment assignment and the outcome. The result is a best linear predictor for effect heterogeneity based on impact groups. We find that our proposed method has lower absolute errors as well as smaller bias than the benchmark doubly-robust estimator. We further introduce a bagging type averaging for the CATE function for each observation to avoid biases through sample splitting. The advantage of the proposed method is a robust linear estimation of heterogeneous group treatment effects in observational studies.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:1911.02688

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Selection bias

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Fixed Effects and the Generalized Mundlak Estimator

2018-07-05 · Dmitry Arkhangelsky, Guido Imbens

We develop a new approach for estimating average treatment effects in observational studies with unobserved group-level heterogeneity. We consider a general model with group-level unconfoundedness and provide conditions …

regression

Detecting critical treatment effect bias in small subgroups

2024-04-29 · Piersilvio De Bartolomeis, Javier Abad, Konstantin Donhauser, Fanny Yang

Randomized trials are considered the gold standard for making informed decisions in medicine, yet they often lack generalizability to the patient populations in clinical practice. Observational studies, on the other hand…

BenchmarkingDecision Makingvalid

Identifying treatment response subgroups in observational time-to-event data

2024-08-06 · Vincent Jeanselme, Chang Ho Yoon, Fabian Falck, Brian Tom 외

Identifying patient subgroups with different treatment responses is an important task to inform medical recommendations, guidelines, and the design of future clinical trials. Existing approaches for treatment effect esti…

Contamination Bias in Linear Regressions

2021-06-09 · Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham, Peter Hull, Michal Kolesár

We study regressions with multiple treatments and a set of controls that is flexible enough to purge omitted variable bias. We show that these regressions generally fail to estimate convex averages of heterogeneous treat…

Falsification before Extrapolation in Causal Effect Estimation

2022-09-27 · Zeshan Hussain, Michael Oberst, Ming-Chieh Shih, David Sontag

Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) represent a gold standard when developing policy guidelines. However, RCTs are often narrow, and lack data on broader populations of interest. Causal effects in these populations are o…

Selection bias