Habitat classification from satellite observations with sparse annotations
Remote sensing benefits habitat conservation by making monitoring of large areas easier compared to field surveying especially if the remote sensed data can be automatically analyzed. An important aspect of monitoring is classifying and mapping habitat types present in the monitored area. Automatic classification is a difficult task, as classes have fine-grained differences and their distributions are long-tailed and unbalanced. Usually training data used for automatic land cover classification relies on fully annotated segmentation maps, annotated from remote sensed imagery to a fairly high-level taxonomy, i.e., classes such as forest, farmland, or urban area. A challenge with automatic habitat classification is that reliable data annotation requires field-surveys. Therefore, full segmentation maps are expensive to produce, and training data is often sparse, point-like, and limited to areas accessible by foot. Methods for utilizing these limited data more efficiently are needed. We address these problems by proposing a method for habitat classification and mapping, and apply this method to classify the entire northern Finnish Lapland area into Natura2000 classes. The method is characterized by using finely-grained, sparse, single-pixel annotations collected from the field, combined with large amounts of unannotated data to produce segmentation maps. Supervised, unsupervised and semi-supervised methods are compared, and the benefits of transfer learning from a larger out-of-domain dataset are demonstrated. We propose a \ac{CNN} biased towards center pixel classification ensembled with a random forest classifier, that produces higher quality classifications than the models themselves alone. We show that cropping augmentations, test-time augmentation and semi-supervised learning can help classification even further.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
ClassificationLand Cover ClassificationSegmentationTransfer LearningSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Continental-scale habitat distribution modelling with multimodal earth observation foundation models
Habitats integrate the abiotic conditions, vegetation composition and structure that support biodiversity and sustain nature's contributions to people. Most habitats face mounting pressures from human activities, which r…
WildSAT: Learning Satellite Image Representations from Wildlife Observations
What does the presence of a species reveal about a geographic location? We posit that habitat, climate, and environmental preferences reflected in species distributions provide a rich source of supervision for learning s…
Contrastive LearningNatural Numerical Networks for Natura 2000 habitats classification by satellite images
Natural numerical networks are introduced as a new classification algorithm based on the numerical solution of nonlinear partial differential equations of forward-backward diffusion type on complete graphs. The proposed …
ClassificationGraph ClassificationBelow-ground Fungal Biodiversity Can be Monitored Using Self-Supervised Learning Satellite Features
Mycorrhizal fungi are vital to terrestrial ecosystem functioning. Yet monitoring their biodiversity at landscape scales is often unfeasible due to time and cost constraints. Current predictions suggest that 90\% of mycor…
Self-Supervised LearningAutomated classification of natural habitats using ground-level imagery
Accurate classification of terrestrial habitats is critical for biodiversity conservation, ecological monitoring, and land-use planning. Several habitat classification schemes are in use, typically based on analysis of s…