paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Harnessing Textual Refusal Directions for Multimodal Safety

2026-06-30 · Moreno D'Incà, Nicu Sebe, Massimiliano Mancini arxiv

To improve safety in Large Language Models (LLMs) we can either perform post-training alignment or exploit refusal directions in the activation space. Both strategies are less feasible in Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) as they require unsafe multimodal data, harder to collect than their unimodal counterpart. In this work, we relax this constraint and investigate whether textual refusal directions, extracted directly from the LLM backbone, generalize across modalities (i.e., image, video). Preliminary findings confirm this ability, though effectiveness is conditioned by layer selection, steering strength, and cross-modal alignment, with the latter causing safe multimodal inputs to be spuriously steered toward refusal. Building on this, we introduce Modality-Agnostic Refusal Steering (MARS), a light-weight training-free approach that injects multimodal safety without the need for multimodal safety data. MARS corrects modality misalignment via activation re-centering, adaptively scales steering strength within a geometrically defined trust region, and selects the optimal intervention layer, operating at the first generated token. Evaluated on five SOTA MLLMs across safety, utility, and video jailbreak benchmarks, MARS achieves consistent safety gains while preserving utility. These results reveal that safety-relevant structure is shared across modalities and that textual refusal directions are a powerful and underexplored foundation for multimodal alignment.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2606.31876

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

KSAFE-MM: A Multimodal Safety Benchmark via Localized Contextualization for Korean Cultural Risks

2026-05-27 · Yongwoo Kim, Sojung An, Yunjin Park, Jungwon Yoon 외 arxiv

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) exacerbate safety risks by introducing vulnerabilities across multiple modalities, such as language and vision. Current MLLM safety evaluation tools, however, suffer from major li…

Understanding and Mitigating Overrefusal in LLMs from an Unveiling Perspective of Safety Decision Boundary

2025-05-23 · Licheng Pan, Yongqi Tong, Xin Zhang, Xiaolu Zhang 외

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide range of tasks, yet they often refuse to answer legitimate queries-a phenomenon known as overrefusal. Overrefusal typically stems from …

Safety Alignment

HARC: Coupling Harmfulness and Refusal Directions for Robust Safety Alignment

2026-07-01 · Shei Pern Chua, Hao Wu, Fangzhao Wu arxiv

Understanding how aligned LLMs internally represent safety is critical for diagnosing alignment vulnerabilities, as it explains why jailbreaks succeed and informs the design of robust alignment strategies. Prior work sho…

From Refusal Tokens to Refusal Control: Discovering and Steering Category-Specific Refusal Directions

2026-03-09 · Rishab Alagharu, Ishneet Sukhvinder Singh, Shaibi Shamsudeen, Zhen Wu 외 arxiv

Language models are commonly fine-tuned for safety alignment to refuse harmful prompts. One approach fine-tunes them to generate categorical refusal tokens that distinguish different refusal types before responding. In t…

SAVeS: Steering Safety Judgments in Vision-Language Models via Semantic Cues

2026-03-19 · Carlos Hinojosa, Clemens Grange, Bernard Ghanem arxiv

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world and embodied settings where safety decisions depend on visual context. However, it remains unclear which visual evidence drives these judgments. We st…