paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Unified Generative & Dense Retrieval for Query Rewriting in Sponsored Search

2022-09-13 · Akash Kumar Mohankumar, Bhargav Dodla, Gururaj K, Amit Singh

Sponsored search is a key revenue source for search engines, where advertisers bid on keywords to target users or search queries of interest. However, finding relevant keywords for a given query is challenging due to the large and dynamic keyword space, ambiguous user/advertiser intents, and diverse possible topics and languages. In this work, we present a comprehensive comparison between two paradigms for online query rewriting: Generative (NLG) and Dense Retrieval (DR) methods. We observe that both methods offer complementary benefits that are additive. As a result, we show that around 40% of the high-quality keywords retrieved by the two approaches are unique and not retrieved by the other. To leverage the strengths of both methods, we propose CLOVER-Unity, a novel approach that unifies generative and dense retrieval methods in one single model. Through offline experiments, we show that the NLG and DR components of CLOVER-Unity consistently outperform individually trained NLG and DR models on public and internal benchmarks. Furthermore, we show that CLOVER-Unity achieves 9.8% higher good keyword density than the ensemble of two separate DR and NLG models while reducing computational costs by almost half. We conduct extensive online A/B experiments on Microsoft Bing in 140+ countries and achieve improved user engagement, with an average increase in total clicks by 0.89% and increased revenue by 1.27%. We also share our practical lessons and optimization tricks for deploying such unified models in production.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2209.05861

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

RetrievalText GenerationText RetrievalUnity

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

QueStER: Query Specification for Generative keyword-based Retrieval

2025-11-07 · Arthur Satouf, Yuxuan Zong, Habiboulaye Amadou-Boubacar, Pablo Piantanida 외 arxiv

Generative retrieval (GR) differs from the traditional index-then-retrieve pipeline by storing relevance in model parameters and generating retrieval cues directly from the query, but it can be brittle out of domain and …

Reinforcement Learning

Interpreting Conversational Dense Retrieval by Rewriting-Enhanced Inversion of Session Embedding

2024-02-20 · Yiruo Cheng, Kelong Mao, Zhicheng Dou

Conversational dense retrieval has shown to be effective in conversational search. However, a major limitation of conversational dense retrieval is their lack of interpretability, hindering intuitive understanding of mod…

Conversational SearchRetrieval

Mixed-initiative Query Rewriting in Conversational Passage Retrieval

2023-07-17 · Dayu Yang, Yue Zhang, Hui Fang

In this paper, we report our methods and experiments for the TREC Conversational Assistance Track (CAsT) 2022. In this work, we aim to reproduce multi-stage retrieval pipelines and explore one of the potential benefits o…

Passage RetrievalRetrieval

Sifei at SemEval-2026 Task 8: Hybrid Retrieval and Query Rewriting for Multi-Turn RAG

2026-06-05 · Sifei Meng, Dmitry Ilvovsky arxiv

Multi-turn retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is challenging due to evolving user intent, conversational noise, and strict context limits. We propose a training-free hybrid retrieval pipeline for SemEval-2026 Task 8 th…

Answer Generation

Not All Queries Need Rewriting: When Prompt-Only LLM Refinement Helps and Hurts Dense Retrieval

2026-03-02 · Varun Kotte arxiv

Prompt-only, single-step LLM query rewriting, where a rewrite is generated from the query alone without retrieval feedback, is commonly used in production RAG pipelines, but its effect on dense retrieval is poorly unders…