Historical Review of Variants of Informal Semantics for Logic Programs under Answer Set Semantics: GL'88, GL'91, GK'14, D-V'12
This note presents a historical survey of informal semantics that are associated with logic programming under answer set semantics. We review these in uniform terms and align them with two paradigms: Answer Set Programming and ASP-Prolog -- two prominent Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Paradigms in Artificial Intelligence. Under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
SurveyMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
The informal semantics of Answer Set Programming: A Tarskian perspective
In Knowledge Representation, it is crucial that knowledge engineers have a good understanding of the formal expressions that they write. What formal expressions state intuitively about the domain of discourse is studied …
Informal Persian Universal Dependency Treebank
This paper presents the phonological, morphological, and syntactic distinctions between formal and informal Persian, showing that these two variants have fundamental differences that cannot be attributed solely to pronun…
Towards Ideal Semantics for Analyzing Stream Reasoning
The rise of smart applications has drawn interest to logical reasoning over data streams. Recently, different query languages and stream processing/reasoning engines were proposed in different communities. However, due t…
Logical ReasoningMeta Semantics: Towards better natural language understanding and reasoning
Natural language understanding is one of the most challenging topics in artificial intelligence. Deep neural network methods, particularly large language module (LLM) methods such as ChatGPT and GPT-3, have powerful flex…
Natural Language UnderstandingNegation in the Head of CP-logic Rules
CP-logic is a probabilistic extension of the logic FO(ID). Unlike ASP, both of these logics adhere to a Tarskian informal semantics, in which interpretations represent objective states-of-affairs. In other words, these l…
Negation