How do we get there? Evaluating transformer neural networks as cognitive models for English past tense inflection
There is an ongoing debate on whether neural networks can grasp the quasi-regularities in languages like humans. In a typical quasi-regularity task, English past tense inflections, the neural network model has long been criticized that it learns only to generalize the most frequent pattern, but not the regular pattern, thus can not learn the abstract categories of regular and irregular and is dissimilar to human performance. In this work, we train a set of transformer models with different settings to examine their behavior on this task. The models achieved high accuracy on unseen regular verbs and some accuracy on unseen irregular verbs. The models' performance on the regulars is heavily affected by type frequency and ratio but not token frequency and ratio, and vice versa for the irregulars. The different behaviors on the regulars and irregulars suggest that the models have some degree of symbolic learning on the regularity of the verbs. In addition, the models are weakly correlated with human behavior on nonce verbs. Although the transformer model exhibits some level of learning on the abstract category of verb regularity, its performance does not fit human data well, suggesting that it might not be a good cognitive model.
Code (1)
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
How do we get there? Evaluating transformer neural networks as cognitive models for English past tense inflection
Neural network models have achieved good performance on morphological inflection tasks, including English past tense inflection. However whether they can represent human cognitive mechanisms is still under debate. In thi…
Morphological InflectionAre we there yet? Encoder-decoder neural networks as cognitive models of English past tense inflection
The cognitive mechanisms needed to account for the English past tense have long been a subject of debate in linguistics and cognitive science. Neural network models were proposed early on, but were shown to have clear fl…
DecoderA Comprehensive Comparison of Neural Networks as Cognitive Models of Inflection
Neural networks have long been at the center of a debate around the cognitive mechanism by which humans process inflectional morphology. This debate has gravitated into NLP by way of the question: Are neural networks a f…
Morphological InflectionRecurrent Neural Networks in Linguistic Theory: Revisiting Pinker and Prince (1988) and the Past Tense Debate
Can advances in NLP help advance cognitive modeling? We examine the role of artificial neural networks, the current state of the art in many common NLP tasks, by returning to a classic case study. In 1986, Rumelhart and …
DecoderM3GIA: A Cognition Inspired Multilingual and Multimodal General Intelligence Ability Benchmark
As recent multi-modality large language models (MLLMs) have shown formidable proficiency on various complex tasks, there has been increasing attention on debating whether these models could eventually mirror human intell…
Attribute