How do you revise your belief set with %$;@*?
In the classic AGM belief revision theory, beliefs are static and do not change their own shape. For instance, if p is accepted by a rational agent, it will remain p to the agent. But such rarely happens to us. Often, when we accept some information p, what is actually accepted is not the whole p, but only a portion of it; not necessarily because we select the portion but because p must be perceived. Only the perceived p is accepted; and the perception is subject to what we already believe (know). What may, however, happen to the rest of p that initially escaped our attention? In this work we argue that the invisible part is also accepted to the agent, if only unconsciously. Hence some parts of p are accepted as visible, while some other parts as latent, beliefs. The division is not static. As the set of beliefs changes, what were hidden may become visible. We present a perception-based belief theory that incorporates latent beliefs.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
How Do People Revise Inconsistent Beliefs? Examining Belief Revision in Humans with User Studies
Understanding how humans revise their beliefs in light of new information is crucial for developing AI systems which can effectively model, and thus align with, human reasoning. While theoretical belief revision framewor…
Revising Incompletely Specified Convex Probabilistic Belief Bases
We propose a method for an agent to revise its incomplete probabilistic beliefs when a new piece of propositional information is observed. In this work, an agent's beliefs are represented by a set of probabilistic formul…
Your Face Mirrors Your Deepest Beliefs-Predicting Personality and Morals through Facial Emotion Recognition
Can we really "read the mind in the eyes"? Moreover, can AI assist us in this task? This paper answers these two questions by introducing a machine learning system that predicts personality characteristics of individuals…
Emotion RecognitionFacial Emotion RecognitionRevision by Conditionals: From Hook to Arrow
The belief revision literature has largely focussed on the issue of how to revise one's beliefs in the light of information regarding matters of fact. Here we turn to an important but comparatively neglected issue: How m…
DeltaLogic: Minimal Premise Edits Reveal Belief-Revision Failures in Logical Reasoning Models
Reasoning benchmarks typically evaluate whether a model derives the correct answer from a fixed premise set, but they under-measure a closely related capability that matters in dynamic environments: belief revision under…
Logical Reasoning