paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

How does the optimizer implicitly bias the model merging loss landscape?

2025-10-06 · Chenxiang Zhang, Alexander Theus, Damien Teney, Antonio Orvieto, Jun Pang, Sjouke Mauw arxiv

Model merging combines independent solutions with different capabilities into a single one while maintaining the same inference cost. Two popular approaches are linear interpolation, which simply averages multiple model weights, and task arithmetic, which combines task vectors obtained by the difference between finetuned and base models. While useful in practice, what properties make merging effective are poorly understood. This paper explores how the optimization dynamics affect the loss landscape geometry and its impact on merging success. We show that a single quantity -- the effective noise scale -- unifies the impact of different optimizer components on model merging. Across architectures and datasets, merging success is a non-monotonic function of the effective noise scale, with a distinct optimum. Decomposing this quantity, we find that larger learning rates, stronger weight decay, smaller batch sizes, and data augmentation all independently modulate the effective noise scale and exhibit the same qualitative trend. Unlike prior work connecting optimizer noise to the flatness or generalization of individual minima, we show that it also affects the global loss landscape, predicting when independently trained solutions can be successfully merged. Our findings broaden the understanding of how optimization shapes the loss landscape geometry and its consequences for model merging, suggesting that training dynamics could be further manipulated to improve model merging.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2510.04686

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Data Augmentation

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

The Loss Does Not See the Basis, but Adam Does

2026-08-05 · Devender Singh hf

Gradient descent on a factored model W = UV^top is implicitly biased toward low-rank solutions, while Adam, starting from the same small initialization, is not. We trace the difference to the gauge symmetry of the loss, …

On the implicit minimization of alternative loss functions when training deep networks

2019-09-25 · Alexandre Lemire Paquin, Brahim Chaib-Draa, Philippe Giguère

Understanding the implicit bias of optimization algorithms is important in order to improve generalization of neural networks. One approach to try to exploit such understanding would be to then make the bias explicit in …

Inductive Bias

Same Pre-training Loss, Better Downstream: Implicit Bias Matters for Language Models

2022-10-25 · Hong Liu, Sang Michael Xie, Zhiyuan Li, Tengyu Ma

Language modeling on large-scale datasets leads to impressive performance gains on various downstream language tasks. The validation pre-training loss (or perplexity in autoregressive language modeling) is often used as …

Language ModelingLanguage Modelling

PLUMAGE: Probabilistic Low rank Unbiased Min Variance Gradient Estimator for Efficient Large Model Training

2025-05-23 · Matan Haroush, Daniel Soudry

Accelerator memory and networking constraints have emerged as dominant bottlenecks when training large language models LLMs with billions of parameters. Existing low rank gradient estimators such as GaLoRE and FLORA comp…

Cautious Weight Decay

2025-10-14 · Lizhang Chen, Jonathan Li, Kaizhao Liang, Baiyu Su 외 arxiv

We introduce Cautious Weight Decay (CWD), a one-line, optimizer-agnostic modification that applies weight decay only to parameter coordinates whose signs align with the optimizer update. Unlike standard decoupled decay, …