How much informative is your XAI? A decision-making assessment task to objectively measure the goodness of explanations
There is an increasing consensus about the effectiveness of user-centred approaches in the explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) field. Indeed, the number and complexity of personalised and user-centred approaches to XAI have rapidly grown in recent years. Often, these works have a two-fold objective: (1) proposing novel XAI techniques able to consider the users and (2) assessing the \textit{goodness} of such techniques with respect to others. From these new works, it emerged that user-centred approaches to XAI positively affect the interaction between users and systems. However, so far, the goodness of XAI systems has been measured through indirect measures, such as performance. In this paper, we propose an assessment task to objectively and quantitatively measure the goodness of XAI systems in terms of their \textit{information power}, which we intended as the amount of information the system provides to the users during the interaction. Moreover, we plan to use our task to objectively compare two XAI techniques in a human-robot decision-making task to understand deeper whether user-centred approaches are more informative than classical ones.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Decision MakingExplainable artificial intelligenceExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Analytical Techniques to Support Hospital Case Mix Planning
This article introduces analytical techniques and a decision support tool to support capacity assessment and case mix planning (CMP) approaches previously created for hospitals. First, an optimization model is proposed t…
Decision MakingMachine Teaching for Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Algorithms and Applications
Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) infers a reward function from demonstrations, allowing for policy improvement and generalization. However, despite much recent interest in IRL, little work has been done to understand…
Decision Makingreinforcement-learningReinforcement LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)+1Hospitality-VQA: Decision-Oriented Informativeness Evaluation for Vision-Language Models
Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated impressive multimodal understanding in general domains. However, their applicability to decision-oriented domains such as hospitality remains largely une…
Visual Question AnsweringFatigue Assessment using ECG and Actigraphy Sensors
Fatigue is one of the key factors in the loss of work efficiency and health-related quality of life, and most fatigue assessment methods were based on self-reporting, which may suffer from many factors such as recall bia…
Decision MakingDeep LearningFeature Engineeringfeature selectionThe Utility of “Even if” Semifactual Explanation to Optimise Positive Outcomes
When users receive either a positive or negative outcome from an automated system, Explainable AI (XAI) has almost exclusively focused on how to mutate negative outcomes into positive ones by crossing a decision boundary…