paper-with-me

Papers

How Post-Training Reshapes LLMs: A Mechanistic View on Knowledge, Truthfulness, Refusal, and Confidence

2025-04-03 · Hongzhe Du, Weikai Li, Min Cai, Karim Saraipour, Zimin Zhang, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Yizhou Sun, Shichang Zhang

Post-training is essential for the success of large language models (LLMs), transforming pre-trained base models into more useful and aligned post-trained models. While plenty of works have studied post-training algorithms and evaluated post-training models by their outputs, it remains understudied how post-training reshapes LLMs internally. In this paper, we compare base and post-trained LLMs mechanistically from four perspectives to better understand post-training effects. Our findings across model families and datasets reveal that: (1) Post-training does not change the factual knowledge storage locations, and it adapts knowledge representations from the base model while developing new knowledge representations; (2) Both truthfulness and refusal can be represented by linear vectors in the hidden representation space. The truthfulness direction is highly similar between the base and post-trained model, and it is effectively transferable for interventions; (3) The refusal direction is different between the base and post-trained models, and it shows limited forward transferability; (4) Differences in confidence between the base and post-trained models cannot be attributed to entropy neurons. Our study provides insights into the fundamental mechanisms preserved and altered during post-training, facilitates downstream tasks like model steering, and could potentially benefit future research in interpretability and LLM post-training.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2504.02904

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

BASE 설명 없음

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Mechanistic Origin of Moral Indifference in Language Models

2026-03-16 · Lingyu Li, Yan Teng, Yingchun Wang arxiv

Existing behavioral alignment techniques for Large Language Models (LLMs) often neglect the discrepancy between surface compliance and internal unaligned representations, leaving LLMs vulnerable to long-tail risks. More …

How Neural Losses Shape VAE Latents

2026-05-30 · Giorgio Strano, Luca Cerovaz, Michele Mancusi, Tommaso Mencattini 외 arxiv

Modern VAEs are rarely trained with the pointwise likelihood implied by the standard $β$-VAE objective. In practice, pointwise reconstruction is often combined with perceptual and adversarial losses, despite a lack of un…

Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tuning Enhances Activation Intensity and Diversity in the Internal Circuitry of LLMs

2025-09-25 · Honglin Zhang, Qianyue Hao, Fengli Xu, Yong Li arxiv

Large language models (LLMs) acquire extensive prior knowledge through large-scale pretraining and can be further enhanced via supervised fine-tuning (SFT) or reinforcement learning (RL)-based post-training. A growing bo…

Reinforcement Learning

RL makes MLLMs see better than SFT

2025-10-18 · Junha Song, Sangdoo Yun, Dongyoon Han, Jaegul Choo 외 arxiv

A dominant assumption in Multimodal Language Model (MLLM) research is that its performance is largely inherited from the LLM backbone, given its immense parameter scale and remarkable capabilities. This has created a voi…

Reinforcement Learning

Through the Bottleneck: How Multi-head Latent Attention Separates Content from Position in Language Models

2026-07-25 · Dhruvil S, Fenil Sojitra, Ravirajsinh Chauhan arxiv

Multi-head Latent Attention (MLA), introduced in DeepSeek-V2, compresses key-value pairs through a shared low-rank bottleneck (cKV), achieving 81% KV-cache reduction during inference. Despite its adoption in massive prod…