paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Human Decision-making is Susceptible to AI-driven Manipulation

2025-02-11 · Sahand Sabour, June M. Liu, Siyang Liu, Chris Z. Yao, Shiyao Cui, Xuanming Zhang, Wen Zhang, Yaru Cao, Advait Bhat, Jian Guan, Wei Wu, Rada Mihalcea, Hongning Wang, Tim Althoff, Tatia M. C. Lee, Minlie Huang

Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are increasingly intertwined with daily life, assisting users in executing various tasks and providing guidance on decision-making. This integration introduces risks of AI-driven manipulation, where such systems may exploit users' cognitive biases and emotional vulnerabilities to steer them toward harmful outcomes. Through a randomized controlled trial with 233 participants, we examined human susceptibility to such manipulation in financial (e.g., purchases) and emotional (e.g., conflict resolution) decision-making contexts. Participants interacted with one of three AI agents: a neutral agent (NA) optimizing for user benefit without explicit influence, a manipulative agent (MA) designed to covertly influence beliefs and behaviors, or a strategy-enhanced manipulative agent (SEMA) employing explicit psychological tactics to reach its hidden objectives. By analyzing participants' decision patterns and shifts in their preference ratings post-interaction, we found significant susceptibility to AI-driven manipulation. Particularly, across both decision-making domains, participants interacting with the manipulative agents shifted toward harmful options at substantially higher rates (financial, MA: 62.3%, SEMA: 59.6%; emotional, MA: 42.3%, SEMA: 41.5%) compared to the NA group (financial, 35.8%; emotional, 12.8%). Notably, our findings reveal that even subtle manipulative objectives (MA) can be as effective as employing explicit psychological strategies (SEMA) in swaying human decision-making. By revealing the potential for covert AI influence, this study highlights a critical vulnerability in human-AI interactions, emphasizing the need for ethical safeguards and regulatory frameworks to ensure responsible deployment of AI technologies and protect human autonomy.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2502.07663

Code (1)

sahandfer/manipulation-susceptibility 공식 구현

Tasks

Decision Making

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Must Read: A Systematic Survey of Computational Persuasion

2025-05-12 · Nimet Beyza Bozdag, Shuhaib Mehri, Xiaocheng Yang, Hyeonjeong Ha 외

Persuasion is a fundamental aspect of communication, influencing decision-making across diverse contexts, from everyday conversations to high-stakes scenarios such as politics, marketing, and law. The rise of conversatio…

FairnessMarketingPersuasivenessSurvey

CLAIM: An Intent-Driven Multi-Agent Framework for Analyzing Manipulation in Courtroom Dialogues

2025-06-04 · Disha Sheshanarayana, Tanishka Magar, Ayushi Mittal, Neelam Chaplot

Courtrooms are places where lives are determined and fates are sealed, yet they are not impervious to manipulation. Strategic use of manipulation in legal jargon can sway the opinions of judges and affect the decisions. …

Decision MakingFairness

Humanoid Whole-Body Manipulation via Active Spatial Brain and Generalizable Action Cerebellum

2026-05-20 · Zhizhao Liang, Yi-Lin Wei, Xuhang Chen, Mu Lin 외 arxiv

In this paper, we explore spatial-aware humanoid whole-body manipulation task. Compared with tabletop settings, this task poses two key challenges: 1) Spatial understanding is challenging in complex 3D environments with …

Interpretable Deep Learning under Fire

2018-12-03 · Xinyang Zhang, Ningfei Wang, Hua Shen, Shouling Ji 외

Providing explanations for deep neural network (DNN) models is crucial for their use in security-sensitive domains. A plethora of interpretation models have been proposed to help users understand the inner workings of DN…

Decision MakingDeep Learning

INTENTION: Inferring Tendencies of Humanoid Robot Motion Through Interactive Intuition and Grounded VLM

2025-08-06 · Jin Wang, Weijie Wang, Boyuan Deng, Heng Zhang 외 arxiv

Traditional control and planning for robotic manipulation heavily rely on precise physical models and predefined action sequences. While effective in structured environments, such approaches often fail in real-world scen…