Identifying Incorrect Annotations in Multi-Label Classification Data
In multi-label classification, each example in a dataset may be annotated as belonging to one or more classes (or none of the classes). Example applications include image (or document) tagging where each possible tag either applies to a particular image (or document) or not. With many possible classes to consider, data annotators are likely to make errors when labeling such data in practice. Here we consider algorithms for finding mislabeled examples in multi-label classification datasets. We propose an extension of the Confident Learning framework to this setting, as well as a label quality score that ranks examples with label errors much higher than those which are correctly labeled. Both approaches can utilize any trained classifier. After demonstrating that our methodology empirically outperforms other algorithms for label error detection, we apply our approach to discover many label errors in the CelebA image tagging dataset.
Code (2)
Tasks
ClassificationLabel Error DetectionMulti-Label ClassificationMUlTI-LABEL-ClASSIFICATIONTAGMethods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Rethinking Crowdsourcing Annotation: Partial Annotation with Salient Labels for Multi-Label Image Classification
Annotated images are required for both supervised model training and evaluation in image classification. Manually annotating images is arduous and expensive, especially for multi-labeled images. A recent trend for conduc…
Active Learningimage-classificationImage ClassificationMulti-Label Image ClassificationOne-bit Supervision for Image Classification
This paper presents one-bit supervision, a novel setting of learning from incomplete annotations, in the scenario of image classification. Instead of training a model upon the accurate label of each sample, our setting r…
ClassificationGeneral Classificationimage-classificationImage ClassificationAn automated method of identifying incorrectly labelled images based on the sequences of loss functions of deep learning networks
Deep learning is widely applied in medical image analysis, but up to 10% of manually labelled images may be incorrect, degrading model performance. This paper proposes an automated method to identify incorrectly labelled…
Identifying Mislabeled Images in Supervised Learning Utilizing Autoencoder
Supervised learning is based on the assumption that the ground truth in the training data is accurate. However, this may not be guaranteed in real-world settings. Inaccurate training data will result in some unexpected p…
ClassificationClusteringGeneral Classificationimage-classification+1Re-labeling ImageNet: from Single to Multi-Labels, from Global to Localized Labels
ImageNet has been arguably the most popular image classification benchmark, but it is also the one with a significant level of label noise. Recent studies have shown that many samples contain multiple classes, despite be…
image-classificationImage ClassificationInstance Segmentationobject-detection+3