paper-with-me

Papers

Implicit Causality-biases in humans and LLMs as a tool for benchmarking LLM discourse capabilities

2025-01-22 · Florian Kankowski, Torgrim Solstad, Sina Zarriess, Oliver Bott

In this paper, we compare data generated with mono- and multilingual LLMs spanning a range of model sizes with data provided by human participants in an experimental setting investigating well-established discourse biases. Beyond the comparison as such, we aim to develop a benchmark to assess the capabilities of LLMs with discourse biases as a robust proxy for more general discourse understanding capabilities. More specifically, we investigated Implicit Causality verbs, for which psycholinguistic research has found participants to display biases with regard to three phenomena:\ the establishment of (i) coreference relations (Experiment 1), (ii) coherence relations (Experiment 2), and (iii) the use of particular referring expressions (Experiments 3 and 4). With regard to coreference biases we found only the largest monolingual LLM (German Bloom 6.4B) to display more human-like biases. For coherence relation, no LLM displayed the explanation bias usually found for humans. For referring expressions, all LLMs displayed a preference for referring to subject arguments with simpler forms than to objects. However, no bias effect on referring expression was found, as opposed to recent studies investigating human biases.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2501.12980

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

BenchmarkingReferring Expression

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

BLOOM BLOOM is a decoder-only Transformer language model that was trained on the ROOTS corpus, a dataset comprising hundreds of sources in 46 natural and 13 programming languages…

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

A word association network methodology for evaluating implicit biases in LLMs compared to humans

2025-10-28 · Katherine Abramski, Giulio Rossetti, Massimo Stella arxiv

As Large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into our lives, their inherent social biases remain a pressing concern. Detecting and evaluating these biases can be challenging because they are often impli…

The role of System 1 and System 2 semantic memory structure in human and LLM biases

2026-04-14 · Katherine Abramski, Giulio Rossetti, Massimo Stella arxiv

Implicit biases in both humans and large language models (LLMs) pose significant societal risks. Dual process theories propose that biases arise primarily from associative System 1 thinking, while deliberative System 2 t…

Implicit causality in GPT-2: a case study

2022-12-08 · Hien Huynh, Tomas O. Lentz, Emiel van Miltenburg

This case study investigates the extent to which a language model (GPT-2) is able to capture native speakers' intuitions about implicit causality in a sentence completion task. We first reproduce earlier results (showing…

Language ModelingLanguage ModellingObjectSentence+1

Measuring Implicit Bias in Explicitly Unbiased Large Language Models

2024-02-06 · Xuechunzi Bai, Angelina Wang, Ilia Sucholutsky, Thomas L. Griffiths

Large language models (LLMs) can pass explicit social bias tests but still harbor implicit biases, similar to humans who endorse egalitarian beliefs yet exhibit subtle biases. Measuring such implicit biases can be a chal…

Decision MakingDiagnosticLanguage Modelling

Debiasing Large Language Models toward Social Factors in Online Behavior Analytics through Prompt Knowledge Tuning

2026-03-28 · Hossein Salemi, Jitin Krishnan, Hemant Purohit arxiv

Attribution theory explains how individuals interpret and attribute others' behavior in a social context by employing personal (dispositional) and impersonal (situational) causality. Large Language Models (LLMs), trained…

Intent Detection