Improving Fairness in Criminal Justice Algorithmic Risk Assessments Using Conformal Prediction Sets
Risk assessment algorithms have been correctly criticized for potential unfairness, and there is an active cottage industry trying to make repairs. In this paper, we adopt a framework from conformal prediction sets to remove unfairness from risk algorithms themselves and the covariates used for forecasting. From a sample of 300,000 offenders at their arraignments, we construct a confusion table and its derived measures of fairness that are effectively free any meaningful differences between Black and White offenders. We also produce fair forecasts for individual offenders coupled with valid probability guarantees that the forecasted outcome is the true outcome. We see our work as a demonstration of concept for application in a wide variety of criminal justice decisions. The procedures provided can be routinely implemented in jurisdictions with the usual criminal justice datasets used by administrators. The requisite procedures can be found in the scripting software R. However, whether stakeholders will accept our approach as a means to achieve risk assessment fairness is unknown. There also are legal issues that would need to be resolved although we offer a Pareto improvement.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Conformal PredictionFairnessvalidSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art
Objectives: Discussions of fairness in criminal justice risk assessments typically lack conceptual precision. Rhetoric too often substitutes for careful analysis. In this paper, we seek to clarify the tradeoffs between d…
FairnessInterventions over Predictions: Reframing the Ethical Debate for Actuarial Risk Assessment
Actuarial risk assessments might be unduly perceived as a neutral way to counteract implicit bias and increase the fairness of decisions made at almost every juncture of the criminal justice system, from pretrial release…
BIG-bench Machine LearningCausal InferenceFairnessCounterfactual Risk Assessments, Evaluation, and Fairness
Algorithmic risk assessments are increasingly used to help humans make decisions in high-stakes settings, such as medicine, criminal justice and education. In each of these cases, the purpose of the risk assessment tool …
counterfactualDecision MakingFairnessAlternative Fairness and Accuracy Optimization in Criminal Justice
Algorithmic fairness has grown rapidly as a research area, yet key concepts remain unsettled, especially in criminal justice. We review group, individual, and process fairness and map the conditions under which they conf…
How do "technical" design-choices made when building algorithmic decision-making tools for criminal justice authorities create constitutional dangers?
This two part paper argues that seemingly "technical" choices made by developers of machine-learning based algorithmic tools used to inform decisions by criminal justice authorities can create serious constitutional dang…
Decision Making