Improving fairness in speaker verification via Group-adapted Fusion Network
Modern speaker verification models use deep neural networks to encode utterance audio into discriminative embedding vectors. During the training process, these networks are typically optimized to differentiate arbitrary speakers. This learning process biases the learning of fine voice characteristics towards dominant demographic groups, which can lead to an unfair performance disparity across different groups. This is observed especially with underrepresented demographic groups sharing similar voice characteristics. In this work, we investigate the fairness of speaker verification models on controlled datasets with imbalanced gender distributions, providing direct evidence that model performance suffers for underrepresented groups. To mitigate this disparity we propose the group-adapted fusion network (GFN) architecture, a modular architecture based on group embedding adaptation and score fusion. We show that our method alleviates model unfairness by improving speaker verification both overall and for individual groups. Given imbalanced group representation in training, our proposed method achieves overall equal error rate (EER) reduction of 9.6% to 29.0% relative, reduces minority group EER by 13.7% to 18.6%, and results in 20.0% to 25.4% less EER disparity, compared to baselines. The approach is applicable to other types of training data skew in speaker recognition systems.
Code (1)
Tasks
FairnessSpeaker RecognitionSpeaker VerificationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Adversarial Reweighting for Speaker Verification Fairness
We address performance fairness for speaker verification using the adversarial reweighting (ARW) method. ARW is reformulated for speaker verification with metric learning, and shown to improve results across different su…
FairnessMetric LearningSpeaker VerificationSVEva Fair: A Framework for Evaluating Fairness in Speaker Verification
Despite the success of deep neural networks (DNNs) in enabling on-device voice assistants, increasing evidence of bias and discrimination in machine learning is raising the urgency of investigating the fairness of these …
FairnessSpeaker Verificationspeech-recognitionSpeech RecognitionA Comparison of Differential Performance Metrics for the Evaluation of Automatic Speaker Verification Fairness
When decisions are made and when personal data is treated by automated processes, there is an expectation of fairness -- that members of different demographic groups receive equitable treatment. This expectation applies …
Face RecognitionFairnessSpeaker VerificationThe SYSU System for the Interspeech 2015 Automatic Speaker Verification Spoofing and Countermeasures Challenge
Many existing speaker verification systems are reported to be vulnerable against different spoofing attacks, for example speaker-adapted speech synthesis, voice conversion, play back, etc. In order to detect these spoofe…
Speaker VerificationSpeech SynthesisVoice ConversionTowards Fair ASR For Second Language Speakers Using Fairness Prompted Finetuning
In this work, we address the challenge of building fair English ASR systems for second-language speakers. Our analysis of widely used ASR models, Whisper and Seamless-M4T, reveals large fluctuations in word error rate (W…