paper-with-me

Papers

Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)

2020-03-27 · Joelle Pineau, Philippe Vincent-Lamarre, Koustuv Sinha, Vincent Larivière, Alina Beygelzimer, Florence d'Alché-Buc, Emily Fox, Hugo Larochelle

One of the challenges in machine learning research is to ensure that presented and published results are sound and reliable. Reproducibility, that is obtaining similar results as presented in a paper or talk, using the same code and data (when available), is a necessary step to verify the reliability of research findings. Reproducibility is also an important step to promote open and accessible research, thereby allowing the scientific community to quickly integrate new findings and convert ideas to practice. Reproducibility also promotes the use of robust experimental workflows, which potentially reduce unintentional errors. In 2019, the Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) conference, the premier international conference for research in machine learning, introduced a reproducibility program, designed to improve the standards across the community for how we conduct, communicate, and evaluate machine learning research. The program contained three components: a code submission policy, a community-wide reproducibility challenge, and the inclusion of the Machine Learning Reproducibility checklist as part of the paper submission process. In this paper, we describe each of these components, how it was deployed, as well as what we were able to learn from this initiative.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2003.12206

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

BIG-bench Machine Learning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Reproducibility Challenge NeurIPS 2019 Report on "Competitive Gradient Descent"

2020-01-26 · Gopi Kishan

This is a report for reproducibility challenge of NeurlIPS 2019 on the paper Competitive Gradient Descent (Schafer et al., 2019). The paper introduces a novel algorithm for the numerical computation of Nash equilibria of…

Laying foundations to quantify the "Effort of Reproducibility"

2023-08-24 · Akhil Pandey Akella, David Koop, Hamed Alhoori

Why are some research studies easy to reproduce while others are difficult? Casting doubt on the accuracy of scientific work is not fruitful, especially when an individual researcher cannot reproduce the claims made in t…

Articles

Position: More Rigorous Software Engineering Would Improve Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research

2025-02-02 · Moritz Wolter, Lokesh Veeramacheneni

Experimental verification and falsification of scholarly work are part of the scientific method's core. To improve the Machine Learning (ML)-communities' ability to verify results from prior work, we argue for more robus…

Position

[Re] Numerical influence of ReLU'(0) on backpropagation

2023-09-21 · NeurIPS 2023 11

Neural networks have become very common in machine learning, and new problems and trends arise as the trade-off between theory, computational tools and real-world problems become more narrow and complex. We decided to re…

NeurIPS Should Require Reproducibility Standards for Frontier AI Safety Claims

2026-05-05 · Varad Vishwarupe, Nigel Shadbolt, Marina Jirotka, Ivan Flechais arxiv

Frontier AI safety claims - published assertions that a highly capable general-purpose model is below a threshold of concern, adequately mitigated, or suitable for release - increasingly shape model deployment, governanc…