Improving Users' Mental Model with Attention-directed Counterfactual Edits
In the domain of Visual Question Answering (VQA), studies have shown improvement in users' mental model of the VQA system when they are exposed to examples of how these systems answer certain Image-Question (IQ) pairs. In this work, we show that showing controlled counterfactual image-question examples are more effective at improving the mental model of users as compared to simply showing random examples. We compare a generative approach and a retrieval-based approach to show counterfactual examples. We use recent advances in generative adversarial networks (GANs) to generate counterfactual images by deleting and inpainting certain regions of interest in the image. We then expose users to changes in the VQA system's answer on those altered images. To select the region of interest for inpainting, we experiment with using both human-annotated attention maps and a fully automatic method that uses the VQA system's attention values. Finally, we test the user's mental model by asking them to predict the model's performance on a test counterfactual image. We note an overall improvement in users' accuracy to predict answer change when shown counterfactual explanations. While realistic retrieved counterfactuals obviously are the most effective at improving the mental model, we show that a generative approach can also be equally effective.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
counterfactualQuestion AnsweringRetrievalVisual Question AnsweringVisual Question Answering (VQA)Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Benchmarking Counterfactual Image Generation
Generative AI has revolutionised visual content editing, empowering users to effortlessly modify images and videos. However, not all edits are equal. To perform realistic edits in domains such as natural image or medical…
BenchmarkingConditional Image GenerationcounterfactualImage GenerationGraph Edits for Counterfactual Explanations: A comparative study
Counterfactuals have been established as a popular explainability technique which leverages a set of minimal edits to alter the prediction of a classifier. When considering conceptual counterfactuals on images, the edits…
counterfactualGraph Neural NetworkKnowledge GraphsV-CECE: Visual Counterfactual Explanations via Conceptual Edits
Recent black-box counterfactual generation frameworks fail to take into account the semantic content of the proposed edits, while relying heavily on training to guide the generation process. We propose a novel, plug-and-…
Image EditingNeuroCounterfactuals: Beyond Minimal-Edit Counterfactuals for Richer Data Augmentation
While counterfactual data augmentation offers a promising step towards robust generalization in natural language processing, producing a set of counterfactuals that offer valuable inductive bias for models remains a chal…
counterfactualData AugmentationDiversityInductive Bias+4Counterfactual Explanations for Misclassified Images: How Human and Machine Explanations Differ
Counterfactual explanations have emerged as a popular solution for the eXplainable AI (XAI) problem of elucidating the predictions of black-box deep-learning systems due to their psychological validity, flexibility acros…
counterfactualExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)