paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Incentive Aware AI Regulations: A Credal Characterisation

2026-03-05 · Anurag Singh, Julian Rodemann, Rajeev Verma, Siu Lun Chau, Krikamol Muandet arxiv

The rapid proliferation of AI applications has intensified debate on effective regulation of these black-box services. Effective regulation must balance two competing goals: (1) deterring non-compliant providers from entering the market, while (2) retaining compliant ones. We call this ideal the perfect market outcome (PMO). Regulators face two compounding obstacles that make PMO difficult to achieve: providers hold private information and can act strategically to evade compliance, while any evidence drawn or derived from a finite sample carries statistical uncertainty in proving non-compliance. As this information asymmetry and statistical uncertainty is inherent to any effective regulation, we formalise them through a mechanism design framework that explicitly accounts for such statistical uncertainty. This yields a sharp characterisation: a mechanism achieves PMO if and only if the set of non-compliant evidence distributions forms a closed, convex set of probability measures, known in imprecise probability as a credal set. This result serves as a diagnostic tool to determine whether PMO is achievable under a given regulation. We further show that PMO-achieving mechanisms can be constructed from a collection of hypothesis tests, and validate our theoretical contributions through experiments on spurious-feature and fairness-based regulations.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2603.05175

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Quantifying Epistemic Predictive Uncertainty in Conformal Prediction

2026-02-02 · Siu Lun Chau, Soroush H. Zargarbashi, Yusuf Sale, Michele Caprio arxiv

We study the problem of quantifying epistemic predictive uncertainty (EPU) -- that is, uncertainty faced at prediction time due to the existence of multiple plausible predictive models -- within the framework of conforma…

Active Learning

Is the Volume of a Credal Set a Good Measure for Epistemic Uncertainty?

2023-06-16 · Yusuf Sale, Michele Caprio, Eyke Hüllermeier

Adequate uncertainty representation and quantification have become imperative in various scientific disciplines, especially in machine learning and artificial intelligence. As an alternative to representing uncertainty v…

Binary ClassificationMulti-class Classification

CREDO: Epistemic-Aware Conformalized Credal Envelopes for Regression

2026-03-06 · Luben M. C. Cabezas, Sabina J. Sloman, Bruno M. Resende, Fanyi Wu 외 arxiv

Conformal prediction delivers prediction intervals with distribution-free coverage, but its intervals can look overconfident in regions where the model is extrapolating, because standard conformal scores do not explicitl…

Conformal Credal Self-Supervised Learning

2022-05-30 · Julian Lienen, Caglar Demir, Eyke Hüllermeier

In semi-supervised learning, the paradigm of self-training refers to the idea of learning from pseudo-labels suggested by the learner itself. Across various domains, corresponding methods have proven effective and achiev…

Conformal PredictionSelf-Supervised Learning

A Unified Evaluation Framework for Epistemic Predictions

2025-01-28 · Shireen Kudukkil Manchingal, Muhammad Mubashar, Kaizheng Wang, Fabio Cuzzolin

Predictions of uncertainty-aware models are diverse, ranging from single point estimates (often averaged over prediction samples) to predictive distributions, to set-valued or credal-set representations. We propose a nov…