paper-with-me

Papers

Individualised Treatment Effects Estimation with Composite Treatments and Composite Outcomes

2025-02-12 · Vinod Kumar Chauhan, Lei Clifton, Gaurav Nigam, David A. Clifton

Estimating individualised treatment effect (ITE) -- that is the causal effect of a set of variables (also called exposures, treatments, actions, policies, or interventions), referred to as \textit{composite treatments}, on a set of outcome variables of interest, referred to as \textit{composite outcomes}, for a unit from observational data -- remains a fundamental problem in causal inference with applications across disciplines, such as healthcare, economics, education, social science, marketing, and computer science. Previous work in causal machine learning for ITE estimation is limited to simple settings, like single treatments and single outcomes. This hinders their use in complex real-world scenarios; for example, consider studying the effect of different ICU interventions, such as beta-blockers and statins for a patient admitted for heart surgery, on different outcomes of interest such as atrial fibrillation and in-hospital mortality. The limited research into composite treatments and outcomes is primarily due to data scarcity for all treatments and outcomes. To address the above challenges, we propose a novel and innovative hypernetwork-based approach, called \emph{H-Learner}, to solve ITE estimation under composite treatments and composite outcomes, which tackles the data scarcity issue by dynamically sharing information across treatments and outcomes. Our empirical analysis with binary and arbitrary composite treatments and outcomes demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed approach compared to existing methods.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2502.08282

Code (1)

jmdvinodjmd/HLearner 공식 구현

Tasks

Causal InferenceMarketing

Methods 이 논문이 사용한 방법론

SET Dynamic Sparse Training method where weight mask is updated randomly periodically
Causal inference Causal inference is the process of drawing a conclusion about a causal connection based on the conditions of the occurrence of an effect. The main difference between causal…

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Adversarial De-confounding in Individualised Treatment Effects Estimation

2022-10-19 · Vinod Kumar Chauhan, Soheila Molaei, Marzia Hoque Tania, Anshul Thakur 외

Observational studies have recently received significant attention from the machine learning community due to the increasingly available non-experimental observational data and the limitations of the experimental studies…

counterfactualCounterfactual Inference

Double Machine Learning based Program Evaluation under Unconfoundedness

2020-03-06 · Michael C. Knaus

This paper reviews, applies and extends recently proposed methods based on Double Machine Learning (DML) with a focus on program evaluation under unconfoundedness. DML based methods leverage flexible prediction models to…

BIG-bench Machine Learning

Undersmoothing Causal Estimators with Generative Trees

2022-03-16 · Damian Machlanski, Spyros Samothrakis, Paul Clarke

Inferring individualised treatment effects from observational data can unlock the potential for targeted interventions. It is, however, hard to infer these effects from observational data. One major problem that can aris…

Interpreting Instrumental Variable Estimands with Unobserved Treatment Heterogeneity: The Effects of College Education

2022-11-23 · Clint Harris

Many treatment variables used in empirical applications nest multiple unobserved versions of a treatment. I show that instrumental variable (IV) estimands for the effect of a composite treatment are IV-specific weighted …

Treatment Effects with Targeting Instruments

2020-07-20 · Sokbae Lee, Bernard Salanié

Multivalued treatments are commonplace in applications. We explore the use of discrete-valued instruments to control for selection bias in this setting. Our discussion revolves around the concept of targeting: which inst…

counterfactualSelection bias