Inference for Two-stage Experiments under Covariate-Adaptive Randomization
This paper studies inference in two-stage randomized experiments under covariate-adaptive randomization. In the initial stage of this experimental design, clusters (e.g., households, schools, or graph partitions) are stratified and randomly assigned to control or treatment groups based on cluster-level covariates. Subsequently, an independent second-stage design is carried out, wherein units within each treated cluster are further stratified and randomly assigned to either control or treatment groups, based on individual-level covariates. Under the homogeneous partial interference assumption, I establish conditions under which the proposed difference-in-``average of averages'' estimators are consistent and asymptotically normal for the corresponding average primary and spillover effects and develop consistent estimators of their asymptotic variances. Combining these results establishes the asymptotic validity of tests based on these estimators. My findings suggest that ignoring covariate information in the design stage can result in efficiency loss, and commonly used inference methods that ignore or improperly use covariate information can lead to either conservative or invalid inference. Then, I apply these results to studying optimal use of covariate information under covariate-adaptive randomization in large samples, and demonstrate that a specific generalized matched-pair design achieves minimum asymptotic variance for each proposed estimator. Finally, I discuss covariate adjustment, which incorporates additional baseline covariates not used for treatment assignment. The practical relevance of the theoretical results is illustrated through a simulation study and an empirical application.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Experimental DesignVocal Bursts Valence PredictionSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Nash: Neural Adaptive Shrinkage for Structured High-Dimensional Regression
Sparse linear regression is a fundamental tool in data analysis. However, traditional approaches often fall short when covariates exhibit structure or arise from heterogeneous sources. In biomedical applications, covaria…
regressionVariational InferenceA Two-Stage Interpretable Matching Framework for Causal Inference
Matching in causal inference from observational data aims to construct treatment and control groups with similar distributions of covariates, thereby reducing confounding and ensuring an unbiased estimation of treatment …
Causal InferenceTwo-Stage TMLE to Reduce Bias and Improve Efficiency in Cluster Randomized Trials
Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) randomly assign an intervention to groups of individuals (e.g., clinics or communities) and measure outcomes on individuals in those groups. While offering many advantages, this experimen…
Experimental DesignRegression-Adjusted Estimation of Quantile Treatment Effects under Covariate-Adaptive Randomizations
Datasets from field experiments with covariate-adaptive randomizations (CARs) usually contain extra covariates in addition to the strata indicators. We propose to incorporate these additional covariates via auxiliary reg…
regressionAdjustment with Many Regressors Under Covariate-Adaptive Randomizations
Our paper discovers a new trade-off of using regression adjustments (RAs) in causal inference under covariate-adaptive randomizations (CARs). On one hand, RAs can improve the efficiency of causal estimators by incorporat…
Causal Inferenceregression