Inference in Experiments with Matched Pairs and Imperfect Compliance
This paper studies inference for the local average treatment effect in randomized controlled trials with imperfect compliance where treatment status is determined according to "matched pairs." By "matched pairs," we mean that units are sampled i.i.d. from the population of interest, paired according to observed, baseline covariates and finally, within each pair, one unit is selected at random for treatment. Under weak assumptions governing the quality of the pairings, we first derive the limit distribution of the usual Wald (i.e., two-stage least squares) estimator of the local average treatment effect. We show further that conventional heteroskedasticity-robust estimators of the Wald estimator's limiting variance are generally conservative, in that their probability limits are (typically strictly) larger than the limiting variance. We therefore provide an alternative estimator of the limiting variance that is consistent. Finally, we consider the use of additional observed, baseline covariates not used in pairing units to increase the precision with which we can estimate the local average treatment effect. To this end, we derive the limiting behavior of a two-stage least squares estimator of the local average treatment effect which includes both the additional covariates in addition to pair fixed effects, and show that its limiting variance is always less than or equal to that of the Wald estimator. To complete our analysis, we provide a consistent estimator of this limiting variance. A simulation study confirms the practical relevance of our theoretical results. Finally, we apply our results to revisit a prominent experiment studying the effect of macroinsurance on microenterprise in Egypt.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Heterogeneous causal effects with imperfect compliance: a Bayesian machine learning approach
This paper introduces an innovative Bayesian machine learning algorithm to draw interpretable inference on heterogeneous causal effects in the presence of imperfect compliance (e.g., under an irregular assignment mechani…
BIG-bench Machine LearningCausal InferenceBeyond the Average: Distributional Causal Inference under Imperfect Compliance
We study the estimation of distributional treatment effects in randomized experiments with imperfect compliance. When participants do not adhere to their assigned treatments, we leverage treatment assignment as an instru…
Causal InferenceBootstrap Inference for Quantile Treatment Effects in Randomized Experiments with Matched Pairs
This paper examines methods of inference concerning quantile treatment effects (QTEs) in randomized experiments with matched-pairs designs (MPDs). Standard multiplier bootstrap inference fails to capture the negative dep…
Identification and Inference on Treatment Effects under Covariate-Adaptive Randomization and Imperfect Compliance
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) frequently utilize covariate-adaptive randomization (CAR) (e.g., stratified block randomization) and commonly suffer from imperfect compliance. This paper studies the identification an…
validRobust Multi-view Clustering against Imperfect Information
Real-world multi-view data always suffer from imperfect information problem, where the view-specific observations are absent (i.e., Incomplete Views, IV) and cross-view correspondences are mismatched (i.e., Noisy Corresp…