paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

IntElicit: Eliciting and Assessing Contextualized Creativity via Dialogue Policy Optimization

2026-06-10 · Mingjia Li, Jin Wu, Hong Qian, Wenhao Huang, Yiyang Huang, Yiwen Zhang, Chanjin Zheng, Xiangfeng Wang, Aimin Zhou, Jiajun Guo arxiv

Contextualized assessment offers high ecological validity for evaluating creativity but introduces a critical challenge: observed performance may be confounded with cognitive proficiency (domain knowledge) and agency (willingness to engage). Meanwhile, in the age of generative AI, creative problem solving increasingly occurs in tool-mediated and human--AI interactive environments, making fully static assessment less aligned with contemporary creative practice. To address these issues, this paper proposes IntElicit, a framework for eliciting and assessing contextualized creativity via dialogue policy optimization. IntElicit functions as a constrained adaptive AI Interviewer: it provides non-directive knowledge and agency scaffolds in multi-turn interaction to reduce non-creative confounders, while preserving participants' responsibility for generating the creative content being evaluated. Specifically, to tackle sparse rewards and potential reward hacking (e.g., answer dictation) in open-ended educational dialogue, IntElicit introduces a decomposed process reward mechanism. This mechanism aligns the policy with pedagogical elicitation, rewarding prompts that draw out participant reasoning rather than producing optimal answers on their behalf. Extensive experiments, including participant simulation and a human subject study (N=64), show that IntElicit improves elicited creative outcomes over expert-designed baselines. Together, the results suggest that interactive elicitation can reveal creative potential that static FPSP-style assessment may miss, providing a formative and diagnostic lens for contextualized creativity assessment in AI-mediated learning contexts.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2606.12086

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Assessing and Understanding Creativity in Large Language Models

2024-01-23 · Yunpu Zhao, Rui Zhang, Wenyi Li, Di Huang 외

In the field of natural language processing, the rapid development of large language model (LLM) has attracted more and more attention. LLMs have shown a high level of creativity in various tasks, but the methods for ass…

Language ModellingLarge Language Model

Predicting and Eliciting Addressee's Emotion in Online Dialogue

2013-08-01 · ACL 2013 8 · Takayuki Hasegawa, Nobuhiro Kaji, Naoki Yoshinaga, Masashi Toyoda

Body Maps for Feeling of Creativity in Musical Chord Progression

2024-10-11 · Tatsuya Daikoku, Masaki Tanaka

This study investigates how musical stimuli evoke feelings of creativity through predictive mechanisms, while also examining the role of interoceptive bodily sensations, particularly those linked to the heart and stomach…

Assessing the Creativity of Large Language Models: Testing, Limits, and New Frontiers

2026-05-13 · Samuel Schapiro, Alexi Gladstone, Jonah Black, Heng Ji arxiv

Measuring the creativity of large language models (LLMs) is essential for designing methods that can improve creativity and for enhancing our scientific understanding of this ability. To accomplish this, it has become co…

Do LLMs Agree on the Creativity Evaluation of Alternative Uses?

2024-11-23 · Abdullah Al Rabeyah, Fabrício Góes, Marco Volpe, Talles Medeiros

This paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) show agreement in assessing creativity in responses to the Alternative Uses Test (AUT). While LLMs are increasingly used to evaluate creative content, previous…