paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Intent-Aware Self-Correction for Mitigating Social Biases in Large Language Models

2025-03-08 · Panatchakorn Anantaprayoon, Masahiro Kaneko, Naoaki Okazaki

Self-Correction based on feedback improves the output quality of Large Language Models (LLMs). Moreover, as Self-Correction functions like the slow and conscious System-2 thinking from cognitive psychology's perspective, it can potentially reduce LLMs' social biases. LLMs are sensitive to contextual ambiguities and inconsistencies; therefore, explicitly communicating their intentions during interactions when applying Self-Correction for debiasing is crucial. In this study, we demonstrate that clarifying intentions is essential for effectively reducing biases in LLMs through Self-Correction. We divide the components needed for Self-Correction into three parts: instruction, response, and feedback, and clarify intentions at each component. We incorporate an explicit debiasing prompt to convey the intention of bias mitigation from the instruction for response generation. In the response, we use Chain-of-Thought (CoT) to clarify the reasoning process. In the feedback, we define evaluation aspects necessary for debiasing and propose clear feedback through multi-aspect critiques and scoring. Through experiments, we demonstrate that self-correcting CoT responses obtained from a debiasing prompt based on multi-aspect feedback can reduce biased responses more robustly and consistently than the baselines. We also find the variation in debiasing efficacy when using models with different bias levels or separating models for response and feedback generation.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2503.06011

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Response Generation

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

InterIntent: Investigating Social Intelligence of LLMs via Intention Understanding in an Interactive Game Context

2024-06-18 · Ziyi Liu, Abhishek Anand, Pei Zhou, Jen-tse Huang 외

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the potential to mimic human social intelligence. However, most studies focus on simplistic and static self-report or performance-based tests, which limits the depth and val…

Specification Self-Correction: Mitigating In-Context Reward Hacking Through Test-Time Refinement

2025-07-24 · Víctor Gallego arxiv

Language models (LMs) are susceptible to in-context reward hacking, where they exploit flaws in tainted or faulty written specifications or rubrics to achieve high scores without fulfilling the user's true intent. We int…

Correct Yourself, Keep My Trust: How Self-Correction and Social Connection Shape Credibility in Social Chatbots

2026-06-17 · Biswadeep Sen, Yi-Chieh Lee arxiv

When social chatbots make mistakes, and they do, how they recover determines whether users trust them again. Social chatbots are increasingly integrated into everyday life, yet they remain prone to generating convincing …

TATIC: Task-Aware Temporal Learning for Human Intent Inference from Physical Corrections in Human-Robot Collaboration

2026-03-10 · Jiurun Song, Xiao Liang, Minghui Zheng arxiv

In human-robot collaboration (HRC), robots must adapt online to dynamic task constraints and evolving human intent. While physical corrections provide a natural, low-latency channel for operators to convey motion-level a…

Intent Recognition

Smaller Large Language Models Can Do Moral Self-Correction

2024-10-30 · Guangliang Liu, Zhiyu Xue, Rongrong Wang, Kristen Marie Johnson

Self-correction is one of the most amazing emerging capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), enabling LLMs to self-modify an inappropriate output given a natural language feedback which describes the problems of tha…

Language ModelingLanguage ModellingSafety Alignment