paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Interpretive Blindness

2021-10-19 · Nicholas Asher, Julie Hunter

We model here an epistemic bias we call \textit{interpretive blindness} (IB). IB is a special problem for learning from testimony, in which one acquires information only from text or conversation. We show that IB follows from a co-dependence between background beliefs and interpretation in a Bayesian setting and the nature of contemporary testimony. We argue that a particular characteristic contemporary testimony, \textit{argumentative completeness}, can preclude learning in hierarchical Bayesian settings, even in the presence of constraints that are designed to promote good epistemic practices.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2111.00867

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Beyond Probabilistic Similarity: Structural, Temporal, and Causal Limitations of Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domain

2026-06-08 · Hudson de Martim arxiv

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a standard architectural response to unreliability in legal AI, yet high-profile failures, including fabricated citations submitted to courts and anachronistic legal conten…

DeepBlindness: Fast Blindness Map Estimation and Blindness Type Classification for Outdoor Scene from Single Color Image

2019-11-02 · Jiaxiong Qiu, Xinyuan Yu, Guoqiang Yang, Shuaicheng Liu

Outdoor vision robotic systems and autonomous cars suffer from many image-quality issues, particularly haze, defocus blur, and motion blur, which we will define generically as "blindness issues". These blindness issues m…

General Classification

Scenarios and Recommendations for Ethical Interpretive AI

2019-11-05 · John Licato, Zaid Marji, Sophia Abraham

Artificially intelligent systems, given a set of non-trivial ethical rules to follow, will inevitably be faced with scenarios which call into question the scope of those rules. In such cases, human reasoners typically wi…

Resolving Open-textured Rules with Templated Interpretive Arguments

2022-12-19 · John Licato, Logan Fields, Zaid Marji

Open-textured terms in written rules are typically settled through interpretive argumentation. Ongoing work has attempted to catalogue the schemes used in such interpretive argumentation. But how can the use of these sch…

How Trustworthy Are LLM-as-Judge Ratings for Interpretive Responses? Implications for Qualitative Research Workflows

2026-03-09 · Songhee Han, Jueun Shin, Jiyoon Han, Bung-Woo Jun 외 arxiv

As qualitative researchers show growing interest in using automated tools to support interpretive analysis, a large language model (LLM) is often introduced into an analytic workflow as is, without systematic evaluation …

Decision Making