paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Inverse Scaling in Test-Time Compute

2025-07-19 · Aryo Pradipta Gema, Alexander Hägele, Runjin Chen, Andy Arditi, Jacob Goldman-Wetzler, Kit Fraser-Taliente, Henry Sleight, Linda Petrini, Julian Michael, Beatrice Alex, Pasquale Minervini, Yanda Chen, Joe Benton, Ethan Perez arxiv

We construct evaluation tasks where extending the reasoning length of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) deteriorates performance, exhibiting an inverse scaling relationship between test-time compute and accuracy. Our evaluation tasks span four categories: simple counting tasks with distractors, regression tasks with spurious features, deduction tasks with constraint tracking, and advanced AI risks. We identify five distinct failure modes when models reason for longer: 1) Claude models become increasingly distracted by irrelevant information; 2) OpenAI o-series models resist distractors but overfit to problem framings; 3) models shift from reasonable priors to spurious correlations; 4) all models show difficulties in maintaining focus on complex deductive tasks; and 5) extended reasoning may amplify concerning behaviors, with Claude Sonnet 4 showing increased expressions of self-preservation. These findings suggest that while test-time compute scaling remains promising for improving model capabilities, it may inadvertently reinforce problematic reasoning patterns. Our results demonstrate the importance of evaluating models across diverse reasoning lengths to identify and address these failure modes in LRMs.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2507.14417

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

The Sequential Edge: Inverse-Entropy Voting Beats Parallel Self-Consistency at Matched Compute

2025-11-04 · Aman Sharma, Paras Chopra arxiv

We revisit test-time scaling for language model reasoning and ask a fundamental question: at equal token budget and compute, is it better to run multiple independent chains in parallel, or to run fewer chains that iterat…

Inverse scaling can become U-shaped

2022-11-03 · Jason Wei, Najoung Kim, Yi Tay, Quoc V. Le

Scaling up language models has been empirically shown to improve performance on a wide range of downstream tasks. However, if we were to observe worse performance as a function of scale ("inverse scaling") on certain tas…

Attribute

Inverse Scaling: When Bigger Isn't Better

2023-06-15 · Ian R. McKenzie, Alexander Lyzhov, Michael Pieler, Alicia Parrish 외

Work on scaling laws has found that large language models (LMs) show predictable improvements to overall loss with increased scale (model size, training data, and compute). Here, we present evidence for the claim that LM…

Neural Scaling Universality: If Exponents Are Fixed, Time to Understand Coefficients

2026-06-23 · Yizhou Liu, Jeff Gore arxiv

Neural scaling laws describe how pre-training loss decays as power laws with training time, model size, and compute. This position paper argues that the exponents of these power laws are fixed by generic mechanisms: a on…

Noise Conditional Variational Score Distillation

2025-06-11 · Xinyu Peng, Ziyang Zheng, Yaoming Wang, Han Li 외

We propose Noise Conditional Variational Score Distillation (NCVSD), a novel method for distilling pretrained diffusion models into generative denoisers. We achieve this by revealing that the unconditional score function…

Conditional Image GenerationDenoisingImage Generation